AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT vs AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB) for local AI
Pick two to four systems or devices to see which runs more models, faster, for the kind of work you do.
Winner: AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB)
For general chat: It runs 123 more LLMs (614 vs 491). On the other hand, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is about 7.7× faster on its own top models.
 AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
|
 AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Memory | 20.0 GB VRAM | 512 GB unified |
| Usable for models | 20.0 GB | 471 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 800 GB/s | 205 GB/s |
| FP16 compute | 103.0 TFLOPS | 1.0 TFLOPS |
| Launch price | $899 | — |
| Released | 2022 | 2019 |
| LLMs that run | 491 of 619 | 614 of 619 |
| LLMs that run well | 460 | 459 |
| Image models that run | 57 of 60 | 60 of 60 |
| Video models that run | 22 of 43 | 43 of 43 |
| Decision models that run | 68 of 70 | 70 of 70 |
| Top-10 LLM average score | 96 | 91 |
| Top-10 LLM average speed | 52.4 tok/s | 6.8 tok/s |
| Best LLM | Gemma 4 26B-A4B | MiniMax M3.1 Flash (428B-A23B) |
Highlighted values are the best of the two. Model results assume 8K of context and the default macOS GPU memory limit on Macs.
LLMs
491 of 619 LLMs run on the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. 20.0 GB usable for models.
614 of 619 LLMs run on the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB). 471 GB usable for models.
| Model | QualityRX 7900 XT | SpeedRX 7900 XT | RunsRX 7900 XT | QualityEPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS | SpeedEPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS | RunsEPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B-A4B | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 98/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 127 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3.8 27B | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 94Excellent quality (A+) · 94 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen3.5 27B | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B) | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 118 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| Gemma 4 12B | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.1 tok/s | Runs great | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| TMax 27B | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| K2 Horizon 7B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.8 tok/s | Runs great | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| Fara 1.5 27B | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen3.6 35B-A3B | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| SenseNova Loop 9B Preview | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.6 tok/s | Runs great | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| UI-Mate 27B | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Nex N2 Mini (35B-A3B) | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nanbeige4.3 33B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Ornith 1.5 9B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.6 tok/s | Runs great | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| Sage-A1.5 35B-A3B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3.5 9B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.6 tok/s | Runs great | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Ornith 1.0 9B | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.6 tok/s | Runs great | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| Apodex 1.1 Mini (35B-A3B) | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Ornith 1.0 35B-A3B | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 4 31B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow |
| DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B IT | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 124 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLM-4.7 Flash (30B-A3B) | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Apriel 1.5 15B Thinker | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.5 tok/s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Agents-A1 35B-A3B | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen AgentWorld 35B-A3B | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2.5 24B-A2B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 160 tok/s | Runs great | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| gpt-oss 20B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 136 tok/s | Runs great | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| TMax 9B | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.1 tok/s | Runs great | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-4 Reasoning Vision 15B | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.8 tok/s | Runs great | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Devstral Small 2 (24B) | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen3 14B | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.6 tok/s | Runs great | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Laguna XS 2.1 (33B-A3B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.0 tok/s | Runs great | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Hermes 4 14B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.7 tok/s | Runs great | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Nemotron Cascade 2 30B-A3B | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 155 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nanbeige4.2 3B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.6 tok/s | Runs great | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.7 tok/s | Runs great | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Ministral 3 14B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.1 tok/s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-4 (14B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.9 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| KAT-Coder V2.5 Dev (35B-A3B) | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| EXAONE 4.5 33B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow |
| InternVL3 14B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.8 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 95.7 tok/s | Runs great | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Devstral Small 1.1 (24B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow |
| Magistral Small 2507 | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow |
| Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 155 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 160 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 3 27B IT | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Thinking | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 160 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.9 tok/s | Runs great | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Gemma 4 E4B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 95.7 tok/s | Runs great | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 145 tok/s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Flint (40B-A2.5B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 203 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Magistral Small 2506 | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow |
| Granite 4.2 30B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.3 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| Trinity Mini (26B-A3B) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 145 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| MedGemma 27B Text IT | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.3 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow |
| Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 4B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.8 tok/s | Runs great | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mistral Small 3.2 24B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slow |
| Phi-4 Reasoning Plus (14B) | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.0 tok/s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 160 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Instruct | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 160 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3-VL 8B Instruct | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.1 tok/s | Runs great | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| GLM-4.1V 9B Thinking | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.8 tok/s | Runs great | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Kimi-VL A3B Thinking 2506 | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 115 tok/s | Runs great | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 14B Instruct 1M | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.7 tok/s | Runs great | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Gemma 4 E2B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 86.3 tok/s | Runs great | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternVL3.5 8B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.5 tok/s | Runs great | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Mellum2.1 Thinking (12B-A2.5B) | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 104 tok/s | Runs great | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3 32B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.3 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Spark-X2.6 4B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.3 tok/s | Runs great | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mistral Small 3.1 24B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slow |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-4 Reasoning (14B) | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.0 tok/s | Runs great | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Terminal RSI 27B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Granite 4.1 8B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.0 tok/s | Runs great | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Hunyuan Hy-Memory 30B-A3B | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hemmingway 1.5 | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow |
| Gemma 3 12B IT | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.1 tok/s | Runs great | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| MiniCPM-V 4.5 8B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.5 tok/s | Runs great | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Granite 4.1 30B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen3.5 4B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.6 tok/s | Runs great | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| GLM-4 32B 0414 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Mistral Small 3 24B (2501) | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow |
| Maple Preview (20B-A1B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 178 tok/s | Runs great | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3-Omni 30B-A3B Instruct | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 160 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Sarvam 30B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 184 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Solar Pro Preview 22B | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.2 tok/s | Runs great | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3 8B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.6 tok/s | Runs great | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| North Mini Code 1.0 (30B-A3B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs great | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 115 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| UI-Mate 9B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.7 tok/s | Runs great | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| UI-Venus 2 9B | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.7 tok/s | Runs great | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| EXAONE 4.0 32B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow |
| Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow |
| Groot 19B A3B 261023 | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 128 tok/s | Runs great | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nemotron Nano 9B v2 | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.4 tok/s | Runs great | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| Agents-A1 4B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.7 tok/s | Runs great | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Dolphin Mistral 24B Venice Edition | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slow |
| Voxtral Small 24B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slow |
| MiMo-VL 7B RL | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.8 tok/s | Runs great | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Ministral 3 14B Reasoning | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.1 tok/s | Runs great | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| Mage-VL 4.7B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.9 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| AceReason Nemotron 14B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.7 tok/s | Runs great | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| OpenReasoning Nemotron 14B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.7 tok/s | Runs great | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 14B Instruct | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.7 tok/s | Runs great | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| TMax 4B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.1 tok/s | Runs great | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Ministral 3 8B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.3 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| Apriel Nemotron 15B Thinker | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.2 tok/s | Runs great | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Baichuan M2 32B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.3 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| LFM2 24B-A2B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 164 tok/s | Runs great | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Seed-OSS 36B Instruct | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow |
| Dolphin 3.0 R1 Mistral 24B | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow |
| Magistral Small 1.2 (24B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slow |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny (8B-A1.3B) | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 147 tok/s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Fara 1.5 4B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.7 tok/s | Runs great | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 2 27B IT | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.1 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow |
| Hermes 4.3 36B | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 160 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3 Coder 30B-A3B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 160 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepCoder 14B Preview | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.7 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Falcon 3 10B Instruct | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.8 tok/s | Runs great | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| Reka Flash 3.1 (21B) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.4 tok/s | Runs great | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| Ling Mini 2.0 (16B-A1.4B) | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs great | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mistral Nemo 12B Instruct | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.1 tok/s | Runs great | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| MiMo 7B RL | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.0 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3-VL 4B Instruct | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.7 tok/s | Runs great | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.7 tok/s | Runs great | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| JanusCoder 14B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.7 tok/s | Runs great | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Gemma 2 9B IT | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.6 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Axion 1.0 35B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.0 H Small (32B-A9B) | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 87.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| InternVL3 8B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.2 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Kimi-VL A3B Instruct | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 115 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Pixtral 12B (2409) | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.3 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B v1 | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| InternVL3.5 38B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow |
| QwQ 32B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| GLM-4 9B 0414 | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.8 tok/s | Runs great | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| NorthCUA Nano | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.7 tok/s | Runs great | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.4 tok/s | Runs great | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon-H1 34B Instruct | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow |
| Mistral Small 22B (2409) | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 37Basic quality (D) · 37 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Olmo 3.1 32B Think | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow |
| MiniCPM4 8B | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.6 tok/s | Runs great | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| OpenReasoning Nemotron 32B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Skywork OR1 32B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Devstral Small 2505 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow |
| MiniCPM-o 2.6 8B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.7 tok/s | Runs great | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| InternLM2.5 20B Chat | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.6 tok/s | Runs great | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| NorthCUA Mini | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 167 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Command R (08-2024) 32B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow |
| Mage-VL-Cowork 4.7B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.9 tok/s | Runs great | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.6 tok/s | Runs great | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.9 tok/s | Runs great | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| EXAONE Deep 32B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow |
| GLM-4 9B Chat 1M | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.4 tok/s | Runs great | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| LFM2.5 8B-A1B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 137 tok/s | Runs great | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLM-Z1 32B (0414) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen2.5-Omni 7B | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| Hunyuan 7B Instruct | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.4 tok/s | Runs great | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| InternLM3 8B Instruct | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.9 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Moonlight 16B-A3B Instruct | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 115 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3 Medium (14B) | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.0 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| OLMo 2 32B Instruct | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow |
| Aya Expanse 32B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow |
| InternVL2.5 8B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.3 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen2.5-VL 32B Instruct | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow |
| Foundation-Sec 1.1 8B Instruct | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| SenseNova 6.8 Code2Video | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| GLM-4 9B Chat (2024) | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.8 tok/s | Runs great | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| InternVL3 38B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow |
| Aya Vision 32B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Codestral 22B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.5 tok/s | Runs great | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| MiniCPM5 2B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 78.7 tok/s | Runs great | 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3 4B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.4 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Olmo 3 7B Instruct | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.0 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.3 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| GLM-Z1 9B (0414) | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.8 tok/s | Runs great | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Granite 4.0 H Tiny (7B-A1B) | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 106 tok/s | Runs great | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Apertus v1.5 8B | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.4 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| OLMo 2 13B Instruct | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.8 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Hermes 3 (Llama 3.1 8B) | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Llama 3.1 8B Instruct | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Granite 4.2 3B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.2 tok/s | Runs great | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLiDE 9B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.2 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Seed-Coder 8B Reasoning | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.2 tok/s | Runs great | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen2.5 7B Instruct 1M | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.5 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| OpenHands LM 32B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Granite 3.2 8B Instruct | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.7 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Granite 3.3 8B | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.7 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Falcon-H1 7B Instruct | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.7 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.3 tok/s | Runs great | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| MiniCPM-V 2.6 8B | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.1 tok/s | Runs great | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Ministral 8B (2410) | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.7 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Nemotron 3 Nano 4B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.0 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepHermes 3 Llama 3 8B Preview | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Dolphin 3.0 Llama 3.1 8B | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Tülu 3 8B | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| LLM4Decompile 22B V2 | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.0 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Seed-Coder 8B Instruct | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.2 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| EXAONE 3.5 7.8B | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.0 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.0 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.1 8B Instruct | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.7 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite (16B) | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 130 tok/s | Runs great | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.3 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Nous Hermes 2 SOLAR 10.7B | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| SOLAR 10.7B Instruct | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| InternLM2 Chat 20B | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.6 tok/s | Runs great | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| EXAONE Deep 7.8B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.0 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek V2 Lite Chat | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 130 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternVL2 8B | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.3 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Falcon 3 7B Instruct | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.7 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507 | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.4 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Dolphin 2.9.4 Llama 3.1 8B | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| OpenChat 3.6 8B | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| QwQ 32B Preview | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Aya Vision 8B | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49.9 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Mistral-NeMo-Minitron 8B Instruct | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.2 tok/s | Runs great | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-3.5 Mini Instruct | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.9 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2-VL 7B Instruct | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.9 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Gemma 3n E4B | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 108 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 3 4B IT | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.1 tok/s | Runs great | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3.5 Vision Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.8 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-3 Small 8K Instruct | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 58.3 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Command R7B | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Hunyuan 4B Instruct | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.0 tok/s | Runs great | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| MedGemma 4B IT | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.1 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3 8B Instruct | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Olmo 3 7B Think | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.0 tok/s | Runs great | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Falcon-H1R 7B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.7 tok/s | Runs great | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-4 Mini (3.8B) | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.7 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qianfan-OCR 4B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.9 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-3.5 MoE (42B-A6.6B) | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 127 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Ministral 3 3B | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.5 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2 7B Instruct | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.5 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.5 tok/s | Runs great | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Foundation-Sec 8B Reasoning | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Yi 1.5 34B Chat | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.8 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow |
| AFM 4.5B | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.9 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.1 3B | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 58.4 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM3 1.7B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 115 tok/s | Runs great | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| OpenReasoning Nemotron 7B | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.5 tok/s | Runs great | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Command R7B Arabic | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Apertus 8B Instruct | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.5 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Aya Expanse 8B | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Gemma 3n E2B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 99.2 tok/s | Runs great | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.0 8B Instruct | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.7 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.9 tok/s | Runs great | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternLM2.5 7B Chat | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.6 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-3 Vision 128K Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.8 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| CogVLM2 Llama 3 Chat 19B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Fara 7B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.9 tok/s | Runs great | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Voxtral Mini 3B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.4 tok/s | Runs great | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Dolphin 2.9 Llama 3 8B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 77.3 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| WeVisOne-VL 4B | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.1 tok/s | Runs great | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| S5 nano | 37Basic quality (D) · 37 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.6 tok/s | Runs great | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen1.5 14B Chat | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.7 tok/s | Runs great | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| OLMo 2 7B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.0 tok/s | Runs great | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| CodeGeeX4 All 9B | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.8 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen1.5 32B Chat | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.6 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.3 tok/s | Slow |
| Yi 1.5 9B Chat | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.8 tok/s | Runs great | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| LFM2 8B-A1B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 137 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| LightOnOCR-3 4B | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.7 tok/s | Runs great | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| EXAONE 3.0 7.8B Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.0 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.4 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| RecurrentGemma 9B IT | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.7 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 14.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| Jamba Reasoning 3B | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.0 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2.5-VL 3B | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 63.6 tok/s | Runs great | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLaVA 1.6 34B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.0 tok/s | Slow |
| LFM3-VL 2B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 103 tok/s | Runs great | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Zamba2 7B Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 58.5 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-3 Mini 4K Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.9 tok/s | Runs great | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM3 4B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.7 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM3 3B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.4 tok/s | Runs great | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.0 Micro (3B) | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 58.4 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| North Micro Vision | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 80.0 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Kolibri 1 (78B-A3.5B) | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Aya 23 8B | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.6 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Hermes 2 Pro Mistral 7B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.5 tok/s | Runs great | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Starling LM 7B Beta | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.5 tok/s | Runs great | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| LFM2.5 2.6B | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 73.5 tok/s | Runs great | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Kimi Linear 48B-A3B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82.7 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek Prover V2 7B | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.3 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Falcon3 Mamba 7B Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.2 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Jamba2 3B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 65.5 tok/s | Runs great | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| OpenChat 3.5 (0106) | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.5 tok/s | Runs great | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Phi-4 Mini Reasoning (3.8B) | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.7 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 36.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Yi 34B Chat | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.4 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow |
| Gemma 1.1 7B IT | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.4 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Orca 2 13B | 27Basic quality (D) · 27 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.1 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| StarCoder2 15B Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.8 tok/s | Runs great | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.5 tok/s | Runs great | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Mistral 7B Instruct v0.2 | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.5 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Nous Hermes 2 Mistral 7B DPO | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.5 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| OpenChat 3.5 (1210) | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.5 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| InternLM2 Math Plus 20B | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.6 tok/s | Runs great | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| StableLM 2 12B Chat | 27Basic quality (D) · 27 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.3 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| Gemma 7B IT | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.4 tok/s | Runs great | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| OLMoE 1B-7B Instruct | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 91.5 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen1.5 7B Chat | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.8 tok/s | Runs great | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Baichuan 2 13B Chat | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.2 tok/s | Runs great | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek MoE 16B Chat | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 119 tok/s | Runs great | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 2 13B Chat | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.1 tok/s | Runs great | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| Yi Coder 9B Chat | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.8 tok/s | Runs great | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Granite 4.0 H Micro | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.2 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| OpenHermes 2.5 Mistral 7B | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.5 tok/s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Starling LM 7B Alpha | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.5 tok/s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen2.5-VL 3B Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.9 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3.2 3B Instruct | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.8 tok/s | Runs great | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen1.5 MoE A2.7B Chat | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 122 tok/s | Runs great | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLM4Decompile 9B V2 | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.8 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Falcon-H1 3B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 63.0 tok/s | Runs great | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mistral 7B Instruct v0.1 | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.5 tok/s | Runs great | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Granite Code 20B Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.1 tok/s | Runs great | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| CodeGemma 7B | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.4 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek Coder 6.7B Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 63.9 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| Chandra OCR 2 | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 81.2 tok/s | Runs great | 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3.5 2B | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 87.4 tok/s | Runs great | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLaVA 1.6 Mistral 7B | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.9 tok/s | Runs great | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Unlimited OCR 2 (3B-A0.6B) | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 135 tok/s | Runs great | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLaVA 1.5 13B | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.9 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| WizardLM 13B v1.2 | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.1 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| Hermes 3 Llama 3.2 3B | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.8 tok/s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 3B Instruct | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.2 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.0 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Neural Chat 7B v3.3 | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.5 tok/s | Runs great | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| LLM4Decompile 6.7B V2 | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 63.9 tok/s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| TMax 2B | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 106 tok/s | Runs great | 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon Mamba 7B Instruct | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.2 tok/s | Runs great | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3-VL 2B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 93.1 tok/s | Runs great | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| StarCoder2 15B (base) | 31Basic quality (D) · 31 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.8 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Vicuna 13B v1.5 | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.1 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Falcon 3 3B Instruct | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.4 tok/s | Runs great | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Zephyr 7B Beta | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.5 tok/s | Runs great | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 128 tok/s | Runs great | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| SQLCoder 7B v2 | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 63.9 tok/s | Runs great | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| LFM2 2.6B | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 77.2 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Unlimited OCR (3B-A0.6B) | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 135 tok/s | Runs great | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek Coder 33B Instruct | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 41Fair quality (C) · 41 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 tok/s | Slow |
| Code Llama 13B Instruct | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.9 tok/s | Runs great | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen2.5-Math 7B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56.5 tok/s | Runs great | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Granite Code 34B Instruct | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.4 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow |
| Baichuan 2 7B Chat | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.3 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite Code 8B Instruct (128K) | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.5 tok/s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen2.5-Omni 3B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 77.7 tok/s | Runs great | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Orca 2 7B | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 63.9 tok/s | Runs great | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Mathstral 7B | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.4 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Yi 1.5 6B Chat | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 71.0 tok/s | Runs great | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.8 tok/s | Runs well |
| Nemotron Mini 4B Instruct | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.4 tok/s | Runs great | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Codestral Mamba 7B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.1 tok/s | Runs great | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Code Llama 34B Instruct | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.2 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 tok/s | Slow |
| Granite 3.2 2B Instruct | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 78.4 tok/s | Runs great | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.3 2B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 78.4 tok/s | Runs great | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternLM2 Math Plus 7B | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.6 tok/s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| EXAONE 3.5 2.4B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82.3 tok/s | Runs great | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 2 7B Chat | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 63.9 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| StarCoder 15B | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.2 tok/s | Runs great | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 45/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Granite Vision 3.2 2B | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 66.6 tok/s | Runs great | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3 1.7B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 97.7 tok/s | Runs great | 29Basic quality (D) · 29 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 70.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.1 2B Instruct | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 78.4 tok/s | Runs great | 27Basic quality (D) · 27 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 2 2B | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 76.0 tok/s | Runs great | 27Basic quality (D) · 27 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Code Llama 7B Instruct | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 63.9 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM5 1B | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 184 tok/s | Runs great | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 65.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek LLM 7B Chat | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.3 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| WeVisOne VL 2B | 27Basic quality (D) · 27 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 81.3 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.2 tok/s | Runs great | 34Basic quality (D) · 34 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3 Next 80B-A3B Instruct | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 70.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLaVA 1.5 7B | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.0 tok/s | Runs great | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.0 2B Instruct | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 75.4 tok/s | Runs great | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolVLM2 2.2B Instruct | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 88.2 tok/s | Runs great | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| TeleOCR | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 140 tok/s | Runs great | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.1 3B-A800M Instruct | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 119 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 66.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 170 tok/s | Runs great | 32Basic quality (D) · 32 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| EXAONE 4.0 1.2B | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 155 tok/s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 55.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Vicuna 7B v1.5 | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 63.9 tok/s | Runs great | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 1.3B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 153 tok/s | Runs great | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolVLM 2.2B Instruct | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 88.2 tok/s | Runs great | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| WizardMath 7B v1.1 | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.5 tok/s | Runs great | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.9 tok/s | Runs well |
| Yi 6B Chat | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 71.0 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Zamba2 2.7B Instruct | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 74.6 tok/s | Runs great | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| PaddleOCR-VL 1.6 0.9B | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 207 tok/s | Runs great | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 74.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 3.0 3B-A800M Instruct | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 119 tok/s | Runs great | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 66.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2-VL 2B Instruct | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 89.8 tok/s | Runs great | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.0 H 1B | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 136 tok/s | Runs great | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| OLMo 7B Instruct | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.5 tok/s | Runs great | 9Basic quality (D) · 9 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon 40B Instruct | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.2 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 44/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.3 tok/s | Slowoffloads to RAM | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow |
| InternLM 7B | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 58.8 tok/s | Runs great | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon-H1 1.5B Instruct | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 128 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| StableLM Zephyr 3B | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 70.9 tok/s | Runs great | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| StarCoder2 7B | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60.0 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite Code 3B Instruct (128K) | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.0 tok/s | Runs great | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolLM2 1.7B Instruct | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 116 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hunyuan 1.8B Instruct | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 111 tok/s | Runs great | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 1.5B Instruct | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 129 tok/s | Runs great | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2-VL 1.6B | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 126 tok/s | Runs great | 24Basic quality (D) · 24 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Nous Hermes 2 Mixtral 8x7B DPO | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.5 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| LFM2 1.2B | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 170 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Phi-2 2.7B | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 71.4 tok/s | Runs great | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B) | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 71.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 40.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Jamba 1.5 Mini | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.6 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Mixtral 8x7B Instruct | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53.5 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3.5 0.8B | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 228 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 81.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Stable Code Instruct 3B | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 70.9 tok/s | Runs great | 19Basic quality (D) · 19 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternLM2.5 1.8B Chat | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 105 tok/s | Runs great | 17Basic quality (D) · 17 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3.2 1B Instruct | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 160 tok/s | Runs great | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 57.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLiDE 2B | 17Basic quality (D) · 17 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 106 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 51.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2 57B-A14B Instruct | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.6 tok/s | Runs welloffloads to RAM | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Falcon 3 1B Instruct | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 119 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 42.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon 7B Instruct | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 59.6 tok/s | Runs great | 4Basic quality (D) · 4 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 31.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 2B IT | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 79.0 tok/s | Runs great | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 3 1B | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 198 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 71.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| Spark X2.6 1.7B | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 116 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepScaleR 1.5B Preview | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 111 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2 1.5B Instruct | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 129 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hunyuan A13B (80B-A13B) | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| SmolLM 1.7B Instruct | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 116 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 1.5B Instruct | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 129 tok/s | Runs great | 26Basic quality (D) · 26 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| StarCoder2 3B | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 65.5 tok/s | Runs great | 17Basic quality (D) · 17 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.1 tok/s | Runs great |
| OLMo 2 1B Instruct | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 134 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2 700M | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 268 tok/s | Runs great | 18Basic quality (D) · 18 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 111 tok/s | Runs great | 22Basic quality (D) · 22 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 39.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| StableLM 2 1.6B Chat | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 121 tok/s | Runs great | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| StableLM 2 Zephyr 1.6B | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 121 tok/s | Runs great | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen3 0.6B | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 265 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| d1 2B | 21Basic quality (D) · 21 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 103 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5-Math 1.5B Instruct | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 129 tok/s | Runs great | 20Basic quality (D) · 20 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.2 tok/s | Runs great |
| Falcon-H1 0.5B Instruct | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 382 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 63.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| Yi Coder 1.5B Chat | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 134 tok/s | Runs great | 16Basic quality (D) · 16 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 48.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| CodeGemma 2B | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 79.0 tok/s | Runs great | 13Basic quality (D) · 13 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 46.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2.5 350M | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 567 tok/s | Runs great | 14Basic quality (D) · 14 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 93.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| GLiDE 0.8B | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 265 tok/s | Runs great | 11Basic quality (D) · 11 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 43.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2-VL 450M | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 441 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 72.8 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2 350M | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 567 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 93.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| Granite 4.0 H 350M | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 584 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 96.4 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolVLM 500M Instruct | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 389 tok/s | Runs great | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.3 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hunyuan 0.5B Instruct | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 367 tok/s | Runs great | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 405 tok/s | Runs great | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 66.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Instruct | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 147 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| LLM4Decompile 1.3B V2 | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 147 tok/s | Runs great | 12Basic quality (D) · 12 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 52.7 tok/s | Runs great |
| TinyLlama 1.1B Chat | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 180 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 64.6 tok/s | Runs great |
| LFM2.5 230M | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 863 tok/s | Runs great | 10Basic quality (D) · 10 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 142 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hermes 4 70B | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow |
| SmolLM2 360M Instruct | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 551 tok/s | Runs great | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 91.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| InternVL3 78B | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 tok/s | Very slow |
| Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow |
| Command R 35B (v01) | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow |
| DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| Tülu 3 70B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen2 0.5B Instruct | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 405 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 66.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow |
| ERNIE 4.5 0.3B | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 551 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 91.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| SmolVLM 256M Instruct | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 763 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 126 tok/s | Runs great |
| surya ocr 2.5 | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 288 tok/s | Runs great | 15Basic quality (D) · 15 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 47.5 tok/s | Runs great |
| Gemma 3 270M | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 735 tok/s | Runs great | 6Basic quality (D) · 6 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 121 tok/s | Runs great |
| Hermes 3 (Llama 3.1 70B) | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| SmolLM 360M Instruct | 5Basic quality (D) · 5 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 551 tok/s | Runs great | 5Basic quality (D) · 5 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 91.0 tok/s | Runs great |
| QVQ 72B Preview | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow |
| Aya 23 35B | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| Apertus v1.5 70B | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow |
| SmolLM2 135M Instruct | 4Basic quality (D) · 4 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1,526 tok/s | Runs great | 4Basic quality (D) · 4 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 252 tok/s | Runs great |
| Kimi Dev 72B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen2 72B Instruct | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen2-VL 72B Instruct | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 tok/s | Slow |
| Falcon-H1 Tiny 90M Instruct | 3Basic quality (D) · 3 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2,204 tok/s | Runs great | 3Basic quality (D) · 3 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 364 tok/s | Runs great |
| Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct | 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.5 tok/s | Very slowheavy RAM offload | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.1 tok/s | Very slow |
| SmolLM 135M Instruct | 2Basic quality (D) · 2 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1,526 tok/s | Runs great | 2Basic quality (D) · 2 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 252 tok/s | Runs great |
| Apertus 70B Instruct | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow |
| Llama 3 70B Instruct | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen2.5 Coder 0.5B Instruct | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 405 tok/s | Runs great | 8Basic quality (D) · 8 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 45/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 66.9 tok/s | Runs great |
| Qwen2.5-Math 72B Instruct | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 41/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.9 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow |
| DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 41/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow |
| Llama 2 70B Chat | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 40/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 25Basic quality (D) · 25 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| Code Llama 70B Instruct | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 37/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 tok/s | Slowheavy RAM offload | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 46/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| gpt-oss 120B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro (2.8T) | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (552B-A16B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| GLM-5.3 (753B-A40B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Qwen3.8 Max (2.4T-A95B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K3 (2.8T) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| MiMo V2.6 Pro (1T-A42B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.4 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 (560B-A25B) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.5 tok/s | Slow |
| MiniMax M3.1 Flash (428B-A23B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 96Excellent quality (A+) · 96 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 tok/s | Slow |
| Step 5 Preview (600B-A27B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 94Excellent quality (A+) · 94 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| GLM-5.3 Flash (320B-A18B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| MiMo V2.6 Flash (310B-A15B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (552B-A16B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| Mistral Large 4 (1T-A52B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next (125B-A6B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| GLM-5.2 (753B-A40B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Hunyuan Hy4 Preview (780B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Muse Spark Open (816B-A42B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T-A49B) | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Kimi K2.6 (1T) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Ling 3.1 Flash (560B-A25B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.5 tok/s | Slow |
| MiMo V2.5 Pro (1T-A42B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.4 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Intern-S2 (397B-A17B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| GLM-5.1 (744B-A40B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Nex N2 Pro (397B-A17B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro (April 2026) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run |
| Naive N0.5 Flash (309B-A15.5B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| MiniMax M3 (427B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow |
| GLM-5 (744B-A40B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.4 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| K2-Horizon (375B-A23B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 tok/s | Slow |
| Hunyuan Hy3 (295B-A21B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Beam 1.0 (501B-A23B) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.8 tok/s | Slow |
| Kimi K2.5 (1T) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Kimi K2.7 Code (1T) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash (284B-A13B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| MiMo V2.5 (310B-A15B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Ornith 1.5 397B-A17B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek V3.2 (671B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Inkling Small (276B-A12B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| GLM-4.7 (355B-A32B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow |
| Inkling (975B-A41B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.5 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| MiniMax M2.7 (230B-A10B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Step 3.7 Flash (198B-A11B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 tok/s | Slow |
| DeepSeek R1 0528 (671B) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Kimi K2 Thinking (1T) | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Ornith 1.5 122B-A10B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Ling 2.6 1T | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| MiniMax M2.5 (230B-A10B) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek R1 (671B) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash (April 2026) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B) | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| DeepSeek V3.1 (671B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 (1T) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| MiniMax M2.1 (230B-A10B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3 Coder 480B-A35B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 tok/s | Slow |
| MiMo V2 Flash (309B-A15B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Ling 1T | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.5 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Mistral Large 3 (675B) | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Solar Open 2 250B | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Kimi K2 Instruct (July 2025) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.0 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| MiniMax M2 (230B-A10B) | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Command A+ (218B-A25B) | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow |
| K-EXAONE 236B-A23B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 tok/s | Slow |
| LongCat Flash Chat (560B) | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.1 tok/s | Slow |
| Nemotron 3 Super 120B-A12B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Qwen3 235B-A22B | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Devstral 2 (123B) | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.6 tok/s | Very slow |
| InternVL3.5 241B-A28B | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 tok/s | Slow |
| Laguna S 2.1 (118B-A8B) | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.5 tok/s | Runs well |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 tok/s | Very slow |
| Baichuan M3 235B-A22B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| GLM-4.6 (355B-A32B) | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow |
| DeepSeek V3 0324 (671B) | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| GLM-4.6V | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| MiniMax-M1 80K | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow |
| Command A Reasoning (111B) | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.6 tok/s | Very slow |
| GLM-4.5 (355B-A32B) | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.6 tok/s | Slow |
| Ling 3.0 Flash (127B-A5B) | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| MiniMax-M1 40K | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow |
| Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Mistral Medium 3.5 (128B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.6 tok/s | Very slow |
| Trinity Large Thinking (400B-A13B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Command A (111B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.6 tok/s | Very slow |
| ERNIE 4.5 300B-A47B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.8 tok/s | Slow |
| GLM-4.5V | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Hermes 4 405B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.2 tok/s | Very slow |
| Ling 2.6 Flash (104B-A7.4B) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.7 tok/s | Runs well |
| Mistral Large 2.1 (2411) | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.6 tok/s | Very slow |
| Solar Open 100B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| GLM-4.5 Air (106B-A12B) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 tok/s | Runs well |
| Mistral Large 2 (123B) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.6 tok/s | Very slow |
| NorthCUA Pro | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Pixtral Large 124B (2411) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.6 tok/s | Very slow |
| Ring Flash 2.0 (100B-A6B) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| dots.llm1 Instruct | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.4 tok/s | Runs well |
| Ling Flash 2.0 (100B-A6B) | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| MiniMax-Text-01 | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 tok/s | Slow |
| Tülu 3 405B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.2 tok/s | Very slow |
| DeepSeek V3 (671B) | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| Sarvam 105B | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek Coder V2 (236B) | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Leanstral 119B-A6B | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.0 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek Coder V2 Instruct (0614) | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| DeepSeek V2.5 1210 | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Llama 3.1 405B Instruct | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.2 tok/s | Very slow |
| Llama 4 Maverick (17B x 128E) | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Llama 4 Scout 17B-16E | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Command R+ (08-2024) 104B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow |
| DeepSeek V2.5 | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Groot 65B A6B 261023 | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Jamba 1.5 Large | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 tok/s | Very slow |
| Ling 3.0 flash Sante | 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.1 tok/s | Runs well |
| Command R+ 104B (04-2024) | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow |
| DeepSeek V2 Chat | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 43Fair quality (C) · 43 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 tok/s | Runs well |
| Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 5/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| Qwen1.5 110B Chat | 36Basic quality (D) · 36 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 tok/s | Very slow |
| Grok-1 (314B) | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.1 tok/s | Very slow |
| Snowflake Arctic Instruct | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 4/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 tok/s | Runs well |
| Falcon 180B Chat | 23Basic quality (D) · 23 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 3/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.5 tok/s | Very slow |
Image models
57 of 60 image models run on the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. 20.0 GB usable for models.
60 of 60 image models run on the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB). 471 GB usable for models.
| Model | QualityRX 7900 XT | SpeedRX 7900 XT | RunsRX 7900 XT | QualityEPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS | SpeedEPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS | RunsEPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLUX 3 Image Klein | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.3 s | Runs great | 91Excellent quality (A+) · 91 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.9 min | Very slow |
| ERNIE-Image Turbo | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.7 s | Runs great | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.2 min | Slow |
| Z-Image Turbo | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 s | Runs great | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.7 min | Slow |
| Krea 2 Turbo | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.2 s | Runs greatencoder in RAM | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.9 min | Very slow |
| FLUX.2 [klein] 9B | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.7 s | Runs great | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 74 s | Slow |
| MOSS-Image SFT | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16 s | Runs well | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.6 min | Very slow |
| FLUX.2 [klein] 4B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.5 s | Runs great | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37 s | Runs well |
| Z-Image | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19 s | Runs well | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 min | Very slow |
| ERNIE-Image | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25 s | Runs welltight fit | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.1 min | Very slow |
| FLUX.1 Krea [dev] | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18 s | Runs well | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.2 min | Very slow |
| FLUX.1 [dev] | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17 s | Runs well | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.2 min | Very slow |
| Chroma1-HD | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 23 s | Runs well | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.7 min | Very slow |
| FLUX.1 [schnell] | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 s | Runs great | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82 s | Slow |
| Fibo 2.0 Dev | 93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30 s | Runs welltight fit · encoder in RAM | 93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.4 min | Very slow |
| Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.3 s | Runs great | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 66 s | Slow |
| Lumina-Image 2.0 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.9 s | Runs great | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.8 min | Very slow |
| FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34 s | Runs well | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.1 min | Very slow |
| Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13 s | Runs great | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.5 min | Very slow |
| Ideogram 4 | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37 s | Runs wellencoder in RAM | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 min | Very slow |
| Qwen-Image 2.1 Turbo | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19 s | Runs welltight fit · encoder in RAM | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.9 min | Very slow |
| Iris-3B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20 s | Runs welltight fit | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 min | Very slow |
| FLUX.1 Fill [dev] | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15 s | Runs wellencoder in RAM | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.6 min | Very slow |
| CogView4 6B | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21 s | Runs welltight fit | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.3 min | Very slow |
| Kolors | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.7 min | Very slow |
| HiDream-I1 Fast | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15 s | Runs wellencoder in RAM | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.8 min | Very slow |
| Stable Cascade | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.4 s | Runs great | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 min | Very slow |
| Juggernaut XL v9 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.7 s | Runs great | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 min | Very slow |
| RealVisXL V5.0 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.7 s | Runs great | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 min | Very slow |
| Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium | 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.8 s | Runs great | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 min | Very slow |
| HiDream-I1 Dev | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25 s | Runs wellencoder in RAM | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.6 min | Very slow |
| Animagine XL 4.0 | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.3 s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.9 min | Very slow |
| Illustrious XL v0.1 | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.3 s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.9 min | Very slow |
| Playground v2.5 | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.5 s | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.1 min | Very slow |
| PixArt-Σ XL 1024 | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.9 s | Runs great | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62 s | Slow |
| OmniGen2 | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18 s | Runs well | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 min | Very slow |
| DreamShaper XL v2 Turbo | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.7 s | Runs great | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 53 s | Slow |
| Pony Diffusion V6 XL | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.8 s | Runs great | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.6 min | Very slow |
| FireRed-Image-Edit 1.1 | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.1 min | Slowencoder in RAM | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.8 min | Very slow |
| HiDream-I1 Full | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 66 s | Slowencoder in RAM | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 30.8 min | Very slow |
| Animagine XL 3.1 | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.3 s | Runs great | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.9 min | Very slow |
| Qwen-Image-Edit 2511 | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.1 min | Slowencoder in RAM | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54.8 min | Very slow |
| Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.7 s | Runs great | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.1 min | Very slow |
| SDXL-Lightning (4-step) | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.9 s | Runs great | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29 s | Runs well |
| Qwen-Image 2512 | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.4 min | Very slowtight fit · encoder in RAM | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.6 min | Very slow |
| Ming-Image 0.1 Design | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24 s | Runs wellCPU offload | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 min | Very slow |
| AuraFlow v0.3 | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16 s | Runs well | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.6 min | Very slow |
| Stable Diffusion 3 Medium | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 s | Runs great | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.1 min | Slow |
| Hunyuan-DiT v1.2 | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.6 s | Runs great | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.1 min | Very slow |
| FLUX.2 [dev] | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54 s | SlowCPU offload | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.7 min | Very slow |
| Qwen-Image | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.2 min | Very slowCPU offload | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61.6 min | Very slow |
| SDXL Turbo | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.2 s | Runs great | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.2 s | Runs great |
| Kandinsky 3 | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12 s | Runs greatencoder in RAM | 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.2 min | Very slow |
| Realistic Vision V5.1 | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.5 s | Runs great | 42Fair quality (C) · 42 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49 s | Slow |
| DreamShaper 8 | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.5 s | Runs great | 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49 s | Slow |
| Stable Diffusion 1.5 | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.5 s | Runs great | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 49 s | Slow |
| LCM DreamShaper v7 | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.3 s | Runs great | 30Basic quality (D) · 30 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10 s | Runs great |
| SD Turbo | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 0.1 s | Runs great | 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 s | Runs great |
| Cosmos3-Super Text2Image (64B) | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.4 min | Very slow |
| HunyuanImage 3.0 (80B-A13B) | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.1 min | Very slow |
| Qwen-Image 2.1 | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41.1 min | Very slow |
Video models
22 of 43 video models run on the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. 20.0 GB usable for models.
43 of 43 video models run on the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB). 471 GB usable for models.
| Model | QualityRX 7900 XT | SpeedRX 7900 XT | RunsRX 7900 XT | QualityEPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS | SpeedEPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS | RunsEPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTX-2.5 (22B, video + audio) | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 min | Runs greatCPU offload | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 62.3 min | Very slow |
| CogVideoX 5B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 min | Runs great | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.1 h | Very slow |
| CogVideoX 5B I2V | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 min | Runs great | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 53/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.1 h | Very slow |
| HY-OmniWeaving (8.3B, unified video) | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 min | Runs wellencoder in RAM | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.1 h | Very slow |
| Wan 2.1 T2V 1.3B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 min | Runs well | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.7 h | Very slow |
| Wan 2.1 VACE 1.3B | 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.0 min | Runs well | 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 52/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 h | Very slow |
| Kandinsky 6.0 Video Lite (3B, video + audio) | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.9 min | Runs wellencoder in RAM | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.5 h | Very slow |
| LTX-Video 2B | 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29 s | Runs great | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.1 min | Slow |
| SkyReels V2 Diffusion Forcing 1.3B | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.7 min | Runs well | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 h | Very slow |
| CogVideoX 2B | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 69 s | Runs great | 44Fair quality (C) · 44 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.0 min | Slow |
| LTX-Video 13B 0.9.8 (distilled) | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 89 s | Runs greatCPU offload | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.0 min | Slow |
| Wan 2.2 S2V 14B (speech to video) | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26.7 min | Slowencoder in RAM | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.4 h | Very slow |
| Wan 2.1 I2V 14B 480P | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24.0 min | Slowencoder in RAM | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 h | Very slow |
| LTX-2.3 | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.9 min | Runs welltight fit · CPU offload | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 h | Very slow |
| Bernini-R A14B (video generation + editing) | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 19.8 min | SlowCPU offload | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.2 h | Very slow |
| LTX-2 (19B, video + audio) | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.9 min | Runs welltight fit · CPU offload | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 h | Very slow |
| FramePack I2V (HunyuanVideo 13B) | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 min | Runs wellCPU offload | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.6 h | Very slow |
| SCAIL-2 14B (character animation) | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 29.7 min | SlowCPU offload | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.7 h | Very slow |
| SkyReels V2 T2V 14B 540P | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.7 min | SlowCPU offload | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.0 h | Very slow |
| AnimateDiff v3 (SD 1.5) | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25 s | Runs great | 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 48/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.7 min | Slow |
| Open-Sora 2.0 (11B) | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 82.6 min | Very slowtight fit · CPU offload | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 34.2 h | Very slow |
| Mochi 1 Preview (10B) | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.3 min | SlowCPU offload | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.6 h | Very slow |
| Cosmos3-Super Image2Video (64B) | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.7 h | Very slow |
| Kandinsky 6.0 Pro (29B, video + audio) | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.6 h | Very slow |
| MiniMax H3 (33B, video + audio) | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.9 h | Very slow |
| HunyuanVideo 1.5 (8.3B) | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.5 h | Very slow |
| Wan 2.2 I2V A14B | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.3 h | Very slow |
| Wan 2.2 T2V A14B | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.3 h | Very slow |
| SkyReels V2 T2V 14B 720P | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.4 h | Very slow |
| Step-Video T2V (30B) | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.4 h | Very slow |
| Wan-Dancer 14B (music to dance) | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 50.2 h | Very slow |
| Wan 2.1 I2V 14B 720P | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.8 h | Very slow |
| Wan 2.1 T2V 14B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.8 h | Very slow |
| Wan 2.1 VACE 14B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 25.1 h | Very slow |
| Wan 2.2 Animate 14B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.7 h | Very slow |
| Cosmos-Predict2 14B Video2World | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.3 h | Very slow |
| HunyuanVideo 13B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.4 h | Very slow |
| HunyuanVideo I2V 13B | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27.4 h | Very slow |
| Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.9 h | Very slow |
| Cosmos 1.0 Diffusion 7B Text2World | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.3 h | Very slow |
| CogVideoX 1.5 5B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 55/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.3 h | Very slow |
| Cosmos-Predict2 2B Video2World | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.9 h | Very slow |
| Allegro (2.8B) | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 7/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 51/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 13.7 h | Very slow |
Decision models
68 of 70 decision models run on the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. 20.0 GB usable for models.
70 of 70 decision models run on the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB). 471 GB usable for models.
| Model | QualityRX 7900 XT | SpeedRX 7900 XT | RunsRX 7900 XT | QualityEPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS | SpeedEPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS | RunsEPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 Reranker 4B | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56 ms | Runs great | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.2 s | Very slow |
| Qwen3 Reranker 8B | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 89 ms | Runs great | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10.6 s | Very slow |
| zerank-2 | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 56 ms | Runs great | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.2 s | Very slow |
| Jina Reranker v3.5 | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12 ms | Runs great | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 780 ms | Slow |
| Shieldstral 1.0 3B | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 54 ms | Runs great | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.0 s | Very slow |
| Skywork Reward V2 Llama 3.1 8B | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 135 ms | Runs well | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.9 s | Very slow |
| Intern-Decision 4B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 45 ms | Runs great | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.0 s | Very slow |
| Jina Reranker v3 | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12 ms | Runs great | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 780 ms | Slow |
| d1 3B | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 32 ms | Runs great | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.0 s | Very slow |
| mxbai-rerank-large v2 | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 24 ms | Runs great | 82Great quality (A) · 82 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.0 s | Very slow |
| FRIDA-Decisions | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.1 ms | Runs great | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 574 ms | Slow |
| GLiNER2.5 Decide | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.5 ms | Runs great | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 345 ms | Runs well |
| LemonDecider 4B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 27 ms | Runs great | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.2 s | Very slow |
| Qwen3 Reranker 0.6B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12 ms | Runs great | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 780 ms | Slow |
| zerank-1 small | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 26 ms | Runs great | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.2 s | Very slow |
| Skywork Reward V2 Qwen3 8B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 136 ms | Runs well | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 21.1 s | Very slow |
| BGE Reranker v2 Gemma | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37 ms | Runs great | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.3 s | Very slow |
| Qwen3Guard Gen 4B | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 101 ms | Runs great | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.0 s | Very slow |
| Llama Prompt Guard 2 86M | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.8 ms | Runs great | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 394 ms | Runs well |
| mxbai-rerank-base v2 | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 10 ms | Runs great | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 638 ms | Slow |
| GLiClass ModernBERT Large v3 | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.0 ms | Runs great | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 282 ms | Runs well |
| OpenAI Privacy Filter | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.3 ms | Runs great | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 44 ms | Runs great |
| Qwen3Guard Gen 8B | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 153 ms | Runs well | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 s | Very slow |
| BGE Reranker v2 M3 | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.7 ms | Runs great | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 797 ms | Slow |
| DeBERTa v3 Large Zero-shot v2.0 | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.2 ms | Runs great | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 310 ms | Runs well |
| DuoGuard 0.5B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 8.9 ms | Runs great | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 686 ms | Slow |
| Skywork Reward V2 Qwen3 0.6B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16 ms | Runs great | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.7 s | Very slow |
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron Safety Guard 8B v3 | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 150 ms | Runs well | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 s | Very slow |
| GTE Reranker ModernBERT Base | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.5 ms | Runs great | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 213 ms | Runs well |
| Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.8 ms | Runs great | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 394 ms | Runs well |
| ModernBERT Large Zero-shot v2.0 | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.0 ms | Runs great | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 282 ms | Runs well |
| Granite Guardian 4.1 8B | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 157 ms | Runs well | 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.4 s | Very slow |
| GLiGuard 300M | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.1 ms | Runs great | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 296 ms | Runs well |
| Granite Embedding Reranker English R2 | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.5 ms | Runs great | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 213 ms | Runs well |
| Laya | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.1 ms | Runs great | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 296 ms | Runs well |
| Llama Prompt Guard 2 22M | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.7 ms | Runs great | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 103 ms | Runs great |
| WildGuard 7B | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 136 ms | Runs well | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.9 s | Very slow |
| Qwen3Guard Gen 0.6B | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33 ms | Runs great | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 s | Slow |
| Granite Guardian 3.3 8B | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 153 ms | Runs well | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.2 s | Very slow |
| GLiClass Base v3 | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.0 ms | Runs great | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 136 ms | Runs well |
| ProtectAI DeBERTa v3 Prompt Injection v2 | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.8 ms | Runs great | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 254 ms | Runs well |
| NuExtract 2.0 2B | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 103 ms | Runs great | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.2 s | Very slow |
| NuExtract 2.0 4B | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 125 ms | Runs great | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.7 s | Very slow |
| DeBERTa v3 Base Zero-shot v2.0 | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.9 ms | Runs great | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 129 ms | Runs great |
| ShieldGemma 9B | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 100 ms | Runs great | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.0 s | Very slow |
| GLiNER2 Base v1 | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.1 ms | Runs great | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 150 ms | Runs well |
| HHEM 2.1 Open | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.2 ms | Runs great | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 310 ms | Runs well |
| LettuceDetect Large | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12 ms | Runs great | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.1 s | Slow |
| Laya Multilingual | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.6 ms | Runs great | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 227 ms | Runs well |
| ShieldGemma 2B | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 38 ms | Runs great | 58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 3.4 s | Very slow |
| GLiNER Multi v2.1 | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 5.5 ms | Runs great | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 206 ms | Runs well |
| BART Large MNLI | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 6.1 ms | Runs great | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 289 ms | Runs well |
| Llama Guard 3 8B | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 150 ms | Runs well | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 11.0 s | Very slow |
| ms-marco MiniLM L6 v2 | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 4.2 ms | Runs great | 52Fair quality (C) · 52 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 41 ms | Runs great |
| Llama Guard 3 1B | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 61 ms | Runs great | 56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.1 s | Very slow |
| ShieldGemma 27B | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 254 ms | Runs welltight fit | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.2 s | Very slow |
| Llama Guard 4 12B | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 223 ms | Runs well | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 16.4 s | Very slow |
| Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 s | Slow | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 15.2 s | Very slow |
| gpt-oss-safeguard 20B | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.2 s | Slow | 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 9.0 s | Very slow |
| DynaGuard 8B | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.3 s | Very slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 28.9 s | Very slow |
| Selene 1 Mini 8B | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.2 s | Very slow | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 37.5 s | Very slow |
| DynaGuard 1.7B | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 574 ms | Slow | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 7.2 s | Very slow |
| CompassJudger-2 7B | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.1 s | Very slow | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 35.6 s | Very slow |
| GLIDER | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 s | Slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.8 s | Very slow |
| Prometheus 2 7B | 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 2.0 s | Very slow | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 33.8 s | Very slow |
| Flow Judge v0.1 | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 1.0 s | Slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 17.8 s | Very slow |
| CompassJudger-2 32B | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 22.9 s | Very slowoffloads to RAM | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 153.0 s | Very slow |
| Prometheus 2 8x7B | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 47/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 20.4 s | Very slowheavy RAM offload | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 60.8 s | Very slow |
| GLiDE 27B | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 18.2 s | Very slow |
| gpt-oss-safeguard 120B | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | — | Won't run | 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | 12.5 s | Very slow |
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.