Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B) on AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (256 GB)

Can the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (256 GB) run Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B)?

Yes, it runs well

Runs well. At Q4_K_M it needs about 36.7 GB of 230 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 29.3 tok/s.

Best quant: Q4_K_M
Generation speed: 29.3 tok/s
Prompt processing: 93.0 tok/s
First token (1K prompt): 11.0 s
Largest safe context: 256K

Download Raon-1 mini Preview (30B-A4B)

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from KRAFTON, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/KRAFTON/Raon-1-mini-preview (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from KRAFTON. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/krafton-ai/Raon-1-mini-preview (opens in a new tab)

KRAFTON's official repo. KRAFTON also publishes GGUF files (KRAFTON/Raon-1-mini-preview-gguf), but for now they need KRAFTON's llama.cpp fork (krafton-ai/llama.cpp) because upstream llama.cpp support is still pending, so LM Studio and Ollama cannot load them yet. An official MLX version is at KRAFTON/Raon-1-mini-preview-mlx.

git clone https://github.com/krafton-ai/Raon-1-mini-preview

Links checked 5 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at Q4_K_M, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Runs well: How well it runs on the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (256 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	37.6 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of the NAS’s memory that models can use (the rest stays with the NAS system and its storage services); fewer when it goes past that limit.	25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	12.8 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	3.7 / 15
Match score	79.1 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (256 GB)

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Runs	Quality	Download
`Q2_K`	30.6 GB	230 GB	45.7 tok/s	Runs great	61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	All files (opens in a new tab)
`Q3_K_M`	33.2 GB	230 GB	37.0 tok/s	Runs great	73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	All files (opens in a new tab)
`Q4_K_M`	36.7 GB	230 GB	29.3 tok/s	Runs well	83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	All files (opens in a new tab)
`Q5_K_M`	39.5 GB	230 GB	24.5 tok/s	Runs well	85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	All files (opens in a new tab)
`Q6_K`	42.7 GB	230 GB	20.8 tok/s	Runs well	87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	All files (opens in a new tab)
`Q8_0`	49.6 GB	230 GB	15.6 tok/s	Runs well	88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	All files (opens in a new tab)
`F16`	76.7 GB	230 GB	7.4 tok/s	Slow	88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M1 Max (64 GB) Q8_0 · 42.0 tok/s · Runs great
88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M4 Max (64 GB) Q8_0 · 54.2 tok/s · Runs great
88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell F16 · 78.7 tok/s · Runs great
87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Q6_K · 156 tok/s · Runs great
87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M4 Pro (48 GB) Q6_K · 39.9 tok/s · Runs great
83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Q4_K_M · 132 tok/s · Runs great

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.