Llama 4 Maverick (17B x 128E) on Raspberry Pi 5 (8 GB)
Can the Raspberry Pi 5 (8 GB) run Llama 4 Maverick (17B x 128E)?
No, it doesn’t fit
No. Llama 4 Maverick (17B x 128E) needs about 163 GB even at Q2_K; the Raspberry Pi 5 (8 GB) has 6.4 GB usable.
Download Llama 4 Maverick (17B x 128E)
Recommended: Q2_K. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run llama4:maverickQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q2_K files (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct-GGUFOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Meta, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Meta. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/meta-llama/llama-models (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-modelsHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 6.8 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 0.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 0.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 0.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 6.8 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Raspberry Pi 5 (8 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 163 GB | 6.4 GB | — | Won't run | 50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 6/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 199 GB | 6.4 GB | — | Won't run | 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 248 GB | 6.4 GB | — | Won't run | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 288 GB | 6.4 GB | — | Won't run | 69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 332 GB | 6.4 GB | — | Won't run | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 428 GB | 6.4 GB | — | Won't run | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 806 GB | 6.4 GB | — | Won't run | 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Hardware that can run it
-
69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB)
-
50Fair quality (C) · 50 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB)
-
69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M5 Ultra (512 GB)
-
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Instinct MI350X
-
60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Instinct MI325X
-
60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip
Models that do run on the Raspberry Pi 5 (8 GB)
- 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 4B
- 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nanbeige4.2 3B
- 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B
- 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Spark-X2.6 4B
- 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ling 3.0 Tiny (8B-A1.3B)
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.