
Hardware · Raspberry Pi
What AI models can the Raspberry Pi 5 (8 GB) run?
- RAM
- 8.0 GB
- Usable for models
- 6.4 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 17 GB/s
- Runs models on
- CPU cores
- Released
- 2023
Models run on the CPU cores here, so the memory’s speed and how fast those cores can read it set the pace: small models (about 1-4B) are usable, bigger ones are slow. We plan around 6.4 GB of the 8.0 GB (what Linux leaves free for a model). No NPU. Raspberry Pi’s AI Kit and AI HAT+ (Hailo-8L, 13 TOPS; Hailo-8, 26 TOPS) run vision models only. The AI HAT+ 2 (Hailo-10H, 40 TOPS, with its own 8 GB) also runs a few 1.5B LLMs, but in CNX Software’s test it was slower than the Pi’s own CPU.
More about this hardware
| Maker | Raspberry Pi |
|---|---|
| Type | Single-board computer or edge AI board |
| Share of memory for models | 80% (what Linux typically leaves free on a board this size) |
| Chip | Broadcom BCM2712 |
| AI accelerator | No NPU. Raspberry Pi’s AI Kit and AI HAT+ (Hailo-8L, 13 TOPS; Hailo-8, 26 TOPS) run vision models only. The AI HAT+ 2 (Hailo-10H, 40 TOPS, with its own 8 GB) also runs a few 1.5B LLMs, but in CNX Software’s test it was slower than the Pi’s own CPU. |
| Boards with this chip | Raspberry Pi 5 · Raspberry Pi 500 / 500+ · Compute Module 5 |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4267, 32-bit |
| Bandwidth figure | 17.1 GB/s, the chip’s rated memory speed |
| Note | 4× Cortex-A76 at 2.4 GHz. llama.cpp and Ollama run on the CPU; the VideoCore VII GPU isn’t used for LLMs. Speeds assume the CPU reads about 60% of the memory’s rated 17 GB/s, in line with published llama.cpp results (roughly 11-21 tokens/s for Llama 3.2 1B and about 5 for 3B at Q4_K_M). Use the Active Cooler. The 1 GB version leaves too little memory for language models and isn’t listed. |
| Specifications | www.raspberrypi.com |
Apps that run models well on the Raspberry Pi 5 (8 GB)
Linux on ARM boards
1 product with the Raspberry Pi 5 (8 GB)
Best LLMs for the Raspberry Pi 5 (8 GB)
| Quality | Model | Quant | Memory | Speed | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 4B | Q6_K | 4.8 GB | 3.0 tok/s | Slow |
| 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Nanbeige4.2 3B | Q4_K_M | 5.1 GB | 4.2 tok/s | Slow |
| 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B | Q4_K_M | 6.1 GB | 3.9 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Spark-X2.6 4B | Q5_K_M | 4.3 GB | 3.5 tok/s | Slow |
| 57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Ling 3.0 Tiny (8B-A1.3B) | Q4_K_M | 6.2 GB | 12.9 tok/s | Runs welltight fit |
| 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Gemma 4 E4B | Q4_K_M | 6.1 GB | 3.9 tok/s | Slowtight fit |
| 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | SenseNova Loop 9B Preview | Q3_K_M | 6.3 GB | 2.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit |
| 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Ornith 1.5 9B | Q3_K_M | 6.1 GB | 2.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit |
| 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Qwen3.5 9B | Q3_K_M | 6.1 GB | 2.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit |
| 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Qwen3.5 4B | Q5_K_M | 4.7 GB | 3.1 tok/s | Slow |
| 59Good quality (B) · 59 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | TMax 4B | Q5_K_M | 4.4 GB | 3.4 tok/s | Slow |
| 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Ornith 1.0 9B | Q3_K_M | 6.1 GB | 2.3 tok/s | Very slowtight fit |
Best Image models for the Raspberry Pi 5 (8 GB)
| Quality | Model | Quant | Memory | Speed | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | FLUX 3 Image Klein | Q4 GGUF | 5.7 GB | 21.8 min | Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use |
| 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | FLUX.2 [klein] 4B | FP8 | 6.2 GB | 2.9 min | Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use |
| 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | MOSS-Image SFT | Q4 GGUF | 5.4 GB | 53.5 min | Very slowencoder unloaded after use |
| 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Z-Image Turbo | Q4 GGUF | 6.1 GB | 9.5 min | Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use |
| 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Z-Image | Q4 GGUF | 6.1 GB | 64.9 min | Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use |
| 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | SDXL Turbo | FP8 | 4.2 GB | 25 s | Runs well |
Best Video models for the Raspberry Pi 5 (8 GB)
| Quality | Model | Quant | Memory | Speed | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35Basic quality (D) · 35 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | AnimateDiff v3 (SD 1.5) | FP16 | 4.7 GB | 60.6 min | Very slow |
| 49Fair quality (C) · 49 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | LTX-Video 2B | FP8 | 6.1 GB | 71.6 min | Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use |
| 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | CogVideoX 5B | FP8 | 5.9 GB | 10.6 h | Very slowtight fit · CPU offload |
| 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | CogVideoX 5B I2V | FP8 | 6.1 GB | 10.6 h | Very slowtight fit · CPU offload |
| 53Fair quality (C) · 53 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 50/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Wan 2.1 T2V 1.3B | FP8 | 6.0 GB | 14.2 h | Very slowtight fit · CPU offload |
Best Decision models for the Raspberry Pi 5 (8 GB)
| Quality | Model | Quant | Memory | Speed | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | OpenAI Privacy Filter | Q8_0 | 2.4 GB | 159 ms | Runs well |
| 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Jina Reranker v3.5 | Q8_0 | 2.0 GB | 3.5 s | Very slow |
| 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Qwen3 Reranker 4B | Q6_K | 4.7 GB | 23.2 s | Very slow |
| 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Jina Reranker v3 | Q8_0 | 2.0 GB | 3.5 s | Very slow |
| 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | zerank-2 | Q6_K | 4.7 GB | 23.2 s | Very slow |
| 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GLiNER2.5 Decide | Q8_0 | 1.2 GB | 1.5 s | Very slow |
| 86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Shieldstral 1.0 3B | Q8_0 | 5.4 GB | 22.3 s | Very slow |
| 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 78/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | FRIDA-Decisions | Q8_0 | 1.7 GB | 2.5 s | Very slow |
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.
