HunyuanVideo 13B on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Can the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 run HunyuanVideo 13B?

Yes, but slowly (CPU offload)

Slow (CPU offload). At FP8 it needs about 26.6 GB of 32.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 39.1 min.

Best precision: FP8
Memory mode: Sequential CPU offload
Time per clip: 39.1 min
Output: 1280×720, 129 frames, 50 steps

Best app to run it on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

On Windows

ComfyUI

Desktop app · runs on PyTorch (ComfyUI), GGUF via ComfyUI-GGUF

Runs this model with built-in or popular custom nodes; GGUF files load with ComfyUI-GGUF.

Get ComfyUI

On Linux

ComfyUI

Desktop app · runs on PyTorch (ComfyUI), GGUF via ComfyUI-GGUF

Runs this model with built-in or popular custom nodes; GGUF files load with ComfyUI-GGUF.

Get ComfyUI

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download HunyuanVideo 13B

Quantized files · GGUF for ComfyUI

Smaller GGUF versions for ComfyUI (with the ComfyUI-GGUF node). No sign-in needed; the model’s license still applies.

huggingface.co/city96/HunyuanVideo-gguf (opens in a new tab)

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Tencent, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers, Diffusers or ComfyUI.

huggingface.co/tencent/HunyuanVideo (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Tencent. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/HunyuanVideo (opens in a new tab)

git clone https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/HunyuanVideo

Links checked 1 day ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at FP8, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs SlowCPU offload: How well it runs on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090: speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	31.8 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when everything sits in GPU memory; fewer when part spills to system RAM.	12.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	4.2 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	15.0 / 15
Match score	62.9 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every precision on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Memory mode	Runs	Quality	Download
`FP16`	31.2 GB	32.0 GB	—	—	Won't run	72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`FP8`	26.6 GB	32.0 GB	39.1 min	Sequential CPU offload	SlowCPU offload	70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`Q8 GGUF`	27.0 GB	32.0 GB	50.0 min	Sequential CPU offload	Very slowCPU offload	71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q4 GGUF`	30.4 GB	32.0 GB	42.2 min	Text encoder offloaded	Very slowtight fit · encoder in RAM	66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)

Other hardware that runs it

72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell FP16 · 29.3 min · Slow
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper (96 GB GPU) FP16 · 27.9 min · Slow
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA H100 80GB SXM FP16 · 27.9 min · Slow
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA H800 80GB SXM FP16 · 27.9 min · Slow
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA H100 NVL FP16 · 30.2 min · Slow
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition FP16 · 30.2 min · Slow

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.