gpt-oss-safeguard 20B on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Can the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 run gpt-oss-safeguard 20B?

Yes, but slowly

Slow. At MXFP4 it needs about 14.5 GB of 32.0 GB usable and makes one decision in about 812 ms.

Best quant: MXFP4
Time per decision: 812 ms
Decisions per second: 1.2/s
Input assumed: 512 tokens
Returns: Reasoned verdict

Best app to run it on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

On Windows

Ollama

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp (ggml), MLX (Apple silicon, preview)

One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.
Serves an OpenAI-compatible API that other apps and coding tools can use.

ollama run gpt-oss-safeguard:20b

LM Studio Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
llama.cpp Usually the first to support new model architectures.

On Linux

Ollama

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp (ggml), MLX (Apple silicon, preview)

One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.
Serves an OpenAI-compatible API that other apps and coding tools can use.

ollama run gpt-oss-safeguard:20b

LM Studio Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
llama.cpp Usually the first to support new model architectures.

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download gpt-oss-safeguard 20B

Quickest · Ollama

One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.

Get Ollama at ollama.com/download (opens in a new tab) · model page (opens in a new tab)

ollama run gpt-oss-safeguard:20b

Quantized files · GGUF

Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.

huggingface.co/unsloth/gpt-oss-safeguard-20b-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

ollama run hf.co/unsloth/gpt-oss-safeguard-20b-GGUF

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from OpenAI, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/openai/gpt-oss-safeguard-20b (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Links checked 1 day ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at MXFP4, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Slow: How well it runs on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090: speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

PrecisionEditorial precision tier from the model’s published benchmarks, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	34.2 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when everything sits in GPU memory; fewer when part spills to system RAM.	25.0 / 25
SpeedTime for one decision against a 100 ms target: reading the input plus any tokens the model writes.	5.3 / 15
ClarityHow easy the answer is to use in code: a probability or score earns the most, written feedback before a score the least.	10.0 / 15
Match score	74.5 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Runs	Quality	Download
`MXFP4`	14.5 GB	32.0 GB	812 ms	Slow	76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`F16`	45.3 GB	32.0 GB	10.8 s	Very slowheavy RAM offload	76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 49/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Times are for one request with a 512-token input and about 160 tokens written. Batching servers process many requests at once.

Other hardware that runs it

76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell MXFP4 · 808 ms · Slow
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 MXFP4 · 1.0 s · Slow
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 MXFP4 · 1.1 s · Slow
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX MXFP4 · 1.1 s · Slow
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB) MXFP4 · 1.3 s · Slow
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB) MXFP4 · 1.3 s · Slow

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.