QNAP QAI-h1290FX

Hardware · AMD

What AI models can the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (64 GB) run?

RAM
64.0 GB
Usable for models
54.4 GB
Memory bandwidth
205 GB/s
Runs models on
CPU cores
Released
2019

A NAS with this chip runs models on its processor cores, so memory speed sets the pace: small models (about 1-4B) answer at a usable speed, bigger ones are slow. We plan around 54.4 GB for models, what is left after the NAS system and its storage services. Models run in a container (Docker) or the maker’s app store, and speeds assume the NAS isn’t busy with storage work.

More about this hardware

MakerAMD
TypeNAS (network attached storage) processor
Share of memory for models85% (what the NAS system and its storage services typically leave free at this size)
ChipAMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series
AI acceleratorNone. Models run on the processor cores.
NAS models with this chipQNAP QAI-h1290FX · QNAP TS-h1290FX · QNAP TS-h2490FU · QNAP TS-h1090FU · Synology FS6420 · Synology SA6400 · Synology RS11626xs+ · 45HomeLab HL15 2.0 (Fully Built & Burned In) · 45HomeLab HL15 Beast (Fully Built, ASRock Rack / EPYC)
Memory typeSystem RAM, shared with the NAS operating system and its storage services
Bandwidth figure204.8 GB/s, estimated, see the note below
NoteOne profile for every NAS built on this chip. Memory speed is an estimate from the chip’s supported memory in a typical NAS fitting; a unit with one memory module runs slower than one with two. Speed assumes the NAS is not busy with storage work.
Specificationswww.qnap.com

Apps that run models well on the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (64 GB)

For a typical model that fits in memory. Each model page picks the best app for that model on this hardware. All apps

7 products with the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (64 GB)

Best LLMs for the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (64 GB)

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Flint (40B-A2.5B)Recursive Q5_K_M 33.4 GB 39.7 tok/s Runs great
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Kolibri 1 (78B-A3.5B)Aleph Alpha Q4_K_M 52.8 GB 35.5 tok/s Runs welltight fit
88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.6 35B-A3BAlibaba Q4_K_M 27.0 GB 40.2 tok/s Runs great
88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 35B-A3BAlibaba Q4_K_M 27.0 GB 40.2 tok/s Runs great
88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3BOpenBMB Q4_K_M 26.6 GB 40.2 tok/s Runs great
81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3 Coder Next (80B-A3B)Alibaba Q4_K_M 53.8 GB 40.2 tok/s Runs welltight fit
87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nex N2 Mini (35B-A3B)Nex-AGI Q4_K_M 26.5 GB 40.2 tok/s Runs great
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Sage-A1.5 35B-A3BInternScience Q4_K_M 27.0 GB 40.2 tok/s Runs great
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. KAT-Coder V2.5 Dev (35B-A3B)Kuaishou Q4_K_M 26.3 GB 40.2 tok/s Runs great
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.5 35B-A3BDeepReinforce Q4_K_M 27.0 GB 40.2 tok/s Runs great
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apodex 1.1 Mini (35B-A3B)Apodex Q4_K_M 27.0 GB 40.2 tok/s Runs great
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.0 35B-A3BDeepReinforce Q4_K_M 27.0 GB 40.2 tok/s Runs great

Best Image models for the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (64 GB)

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Krea 2 TurboKrea FP16 37.4 GB 2.9 min Very slow
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. FLUX.2 [klein] 9BBlack Forest Labs FP16 37.1 GB 74 s Slow
92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen-Image 2.1Alibaba Q8 GGUF 41.6 GB 47.3 min Very slow
89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen-Image 2512Alibaba Q8 GGUF 36.5 GB 70.9 min Very slow
88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. ERNIE-ImageBaidu FP16 34.0 GB 15.1 min Very slow
93Excellent quality (A+) · 93 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Fibo 2.0 DevBria AI FP16 27.7 GB 15.4 min Very slow

Best Video models for the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (64 GB)

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. LTX-2.5 (22B, video + audio)Lightricks FP8 48.3 GB 56.1 min Very slowtight fit
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. LTX-2.3Lightricks Q8 GGUF 45.6 GB 5.3 h Very slow
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Bernini-R A14B (video generation + editing)ByteDance FP16 46.0 GB 8.2 h Very slow
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Wan 2.2 I2V A14BAlibaba Q8 GGUF 39.3 GB 21.0 h Very slow
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Wan 2.2 T2V A14BAlibaba Q8 GGUF 39.3 GB 21.0 h Very slow

Best Decision models for the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (64 GB)

Quality Model Quant Memory Speed Runs
78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. OpenAI Privacy FilterOpenAI F16 3.8 GB 44 ms Runs great
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Llama Prompt Guard 2 22MMeta Q8_0 0.7 GB 103 ms Runs great
80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GLiNER2.5 DecideFastino Q8_0 1.2 GB 345 ms Runs well
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Jina Reranker v3.5Jina AI Q8_0 5.8 GB 780 ms Slow
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Jina Reranker v3Jina AI Q8_0 5.8 GB 780 ms Slow
90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3 Reranker 4BAlibaba Q8_0 9.5 GB 5.2 s Very slow
66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GLiClass Base v3Knowledgator Q8_0 0.8 GB 136 ms Runs well
80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. FRIDA-DecisionsSber AI Q8_0 1.7 GB 574 ms Slow

Best LLMs by task on this hardware Open in Model Finder

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?