Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B on Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (512 GB)

Can the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (512 GB) run Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B?

Barely: it runs very slowly

Very slow. At FP16 it needs about 43.1 GB of 471 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 7.1 h.

Best precision: FP16
Memory mode: Everything on GPU
Time per clip: 7.1 h
Output: 1280×704, 121 frames, 50 steps

Download Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B

Quantized files · GGUF for ComfyUI

Smaller GGUF versions for ComfyUI (with the ComfyUI-GGUF node). No sign-in needed; the model’s license still applies.

huggingface.co/QuantStack/Wan2.2-TI2V-5B-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Alibaba, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers, Diffusers or ComfyUI.

huggingface.co/Wan-AI/Wan2.2-TI2V-5B (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Alibaba. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/Wan-Video/Wan2.2 (opens in a new tab)

git clone https://github.com/Wan-Video/Wan2.2

Links checked 1 day ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at FP16, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Very slow: How well it runs on the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (512 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	31.5 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of the NAS’s memory that models can use (the rest stays with the NAS system and its storage services); fewer when it goes past that limit.	25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	1.3 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	2.1 / 15
Match score	59.9 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every precision on the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (512 GB)

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Memory mode	Runs	Quality	Download
`FP16`	43.1 GB	471 GB	7.1 h	Everything on GPU	Very slow	70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`FP8`	32.4 GB	471 GB	6.4 h	Everything on GPU	Very slow	68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`Q8 GGUF`	32.8 GB	471 GB	8.2 h	Everything on GPU	Very slow	69Good quality (B) · 69 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q4 GGUF`	30.4 GB	471 GB	8.5 h	Everything on GPU	Very slow	65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)

Other hardware that runs it

70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell FP16 · 6.4 min · Runs well
65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Q4 GGUF · 8.7 min · Runs well (tight fit)
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 FP8 · 10.1 min · Runs well (tight fit · CPU offload)
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX FP8 · 11.3 min · Runs well (tight fit · CPU offload)
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA L40S FP8 · 7.2 min · Runs well
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation FP8 · 7.2 min · Runs well

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.