on

Can the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT run TeleOCR?

40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.

Yes, it runs great

Runs great. At F16 it needs about 5.2 GB of 16.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 112 tok/s.

Best quant
F16
Generation speed
112 tok/s
Prompt processing
42,483 tok/s
First token (1K prompt)
0.3 s
Largest safe context
100K

Best app to run it on the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

On Windows

Docker Model Runner

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp, vLLM

  • Handy if you already work in Docker.
docker model run hf.co/XingChen-AGI/TeleOCR

On Linux

Docker Model Runner

Command line + local API · runs on llama.cpp, vLLM

  • Handy if you already work in Docker.
docker model run hf.co/XingChen-AGI/TeleOCR

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download TeleOCR

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from XingChen-AGI, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/XingChen-AGI/TeleOCR (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from XingChen-AGI. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/caipeng328/TeleOCR (opens in a new tab)

Official code for full document parsing; the model card points here. Formerly named NaviDC-OCR.

git clone https://github.com/caipeng328/TeleOCR

Links checked 5 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
How capable the model itself is at F16, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Runs great
How well it runs on the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT: speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.18.0 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when everything sits in GPU memory; fewer when part spills to system RAM.25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.15.0 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.7.5 / 15
Match score65.5 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Quant Memory needed Available Speed Runs Quality Download
Q2_K 2.9 GB 16.0 GB 782 tok/s Runs great 28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q3_K_M 3.0 GB 16.0 GB 616 tok/s Runs great 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q4_K_M 3.2 GB 16.0 GB 476 tok/s Runs great 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q5_K_M 3.3 GB 16.0 GB 394 tok/s Runs great 38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q6_K 3.5 GB 16.0 GB 331 tok/s Runs great 39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q8_0 3.8 GB 16.0 GB 243 tok/s Runs great 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
F16 5.2 GB 16.0 GB 112 tok/s Runs great 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?