TeleOCR on AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB)

Can the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB) run TeleOCR?

Yes, it runs great

Runs great. At Q8_0 it needs about 40.7 GB of 471 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 50.1 tok/s.

Best quant: Q8_0
Generation speed: 50.1 tok/s
Prompt processing: 282 tok/s
First token (1K prompt): 3.6 s
Largest safe context: 125K

Download TeleOCR

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from XingChen-AGI, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/XingChen-AGI/TeleOCR (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from XingChen-AGI. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/caipeng328/TeleOCR (opens in a new tab)

Official code for full document parsing; the model card points here. Formerly named NaviDC-OCR.

git clone https://github.com/caipeng328/TeleOCR

Links checked 5 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at Q8_0, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Runs great: How well it runs on the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	18.0 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of the NAS’s memory that models can use (the rest stays with the NAS system and its storage services); fewer when it goes past that limit.	25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	15.0 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	2.0 / 15
Match score	60.0 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB)

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Runs	Quality	Download
`Q2_K`	39.8 GB	471 GB	162 tok/s	Runs great	28Basic quality (D) · 28 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 54/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	All files (opens in a new tab)
`Q3_K_M`	39.9 GB	471 GB	127 tok/s	Runs great	33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 57/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	All files (opens in a new tab)
`Q4_K_M`	40.1 GB	471 GB	98.4 tok/s	Runs great	38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	All files (opens in a new tab)
`Q5_K_M`	40.2 GB	471 GB	81.3 tok/s	Runs great	38Basic quality (D) · 38 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	All files (opens in a new tab)
`Q6_K`	40.4 GB	471 GB	68.2 tok/s	Runs great	39Basic quality (D) · 39 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	All files (opens in a new tab)
`Q8_0`	40.7 GB	471 GB	50.1 tok/s	Runs great	40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	All files (opens in a new tab)
`F16`	42.1 GB	471 GB	23.1 tok/s	Runs well	40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 56/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 71/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 F16 · 55.2 tok/s · Runs great
40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Intel Arc B580 F16 · 70.6 tok/s · Runs great
40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB F16 · 73.0 tok/s · Runs great
40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER F16 · 102 tok/s · Runs great
40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M4 (16 GB) Q8_0 · 45.5 tok/s · Runs great
40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M4 Pro (24 GB) F16 · 47.7 tok/s · Runs great

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.