Ring Flash 2.0 (100B-A6B) on Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (64 GB)
Can the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (64 GB) run Ring Flash 2.0 (100B-A6B)?
Yes, it runs well (tight fit)
Runs well (tight fit). At Q2_K it needs about 46.6 GB of 54.4 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 17.5 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q2_K- Generation speed
- 17.5 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 57.4 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 17.8 s
- Largest safe context
- 32K
Best app to run it on the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (64 GB)
On Linux
- Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf mradermacher/Ring-flash-2.0-GGUF:Q2_KDownload Ring Flash 2.0 (100B-A6B)
Recommended for the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (64 GB): Q2_K. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q2_K file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/mradermacher/Ring-flash-2.0-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/mradermacher/Ring-flash-2.0-GGUF:Q2_KOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Ant Group (inclusionAI), for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0 (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Ant Group (inclusionAI). The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/inclusionAI/Ling-V2 (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/inclusionAI/Ling-V2How it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 24.6 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 24.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 9.9 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 73.5 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (64 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 46.6 GB | 54.4 GB | 17.5 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 54Fair quality (C) · 54 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 55.9 GB | 54.4 GB | 11.8 tok/s | Runs wellover memory limit | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 68.3 GB | 54.4 GB | — | Won't run | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 78.5 GB | 54.4 GB | — | Won't run | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 89.9 GB | 54.4 GB | — | Won't run | 77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 115 GB | 54.4 GB | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 211 GB | 54.4 GB | — | Won't run | 78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
-
78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB)
-
75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB)
-
75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GB10 (128 GB)
-
77Great quality (A) · 77 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (128 GB)
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.