Naive N0.5 Flash (309B-A15.5B) on Intel Xeon W-2100 series NAS (512 GB)
Can the Intel Xeon W-2100 series NAS (512 GB) run Naive N0.5 Flash (309B-A15.5B)?
Yes, but slowly
Slow. At Q5_K_M it needs about 258 GB of 471 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 3.4 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q5_K_M- Generation speed
- 3.4 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 23.2 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 44.1 s
- Largest safe context
- 1,024K
Download Naive N0.5 Flash (309B-A15.5B)
Original weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Naive AI, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/NaiveAI/Naive-N0.5-Flash (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Naive AI. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/NaiveAI-Labs/Naive-N0.5-Flash (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/NaiveAI-Labs/Naive-N0.5-FlashHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 41.5 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 4.4 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 12.6 / 15 | |
| Match score | 83.5 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Intel Xeon W-2100 series NAS (512 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 162 GB | 471 GB | 6.8 tok/s | Slow | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 190 GB | 471 GB | 5.4 tok/s | Slow | 79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 227 GB | 471 GB | 4.2 tok/s | Slow | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 258 GB | 471 GB | 3.4 tok/s | Slow | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 292 GB | 471 GB | 2.9 tok/s | Very slow | 94Excellent quality (A+) · 94 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 366 GB | 471 GB | 2.1 tok/s | Very slow | 95Excellent quality (A+) · 95 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | All files (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 656 GB | 471 GB | — | Won't run | 95Excellent quality (A+) · 95 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB)
-
79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB)
-
66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
-
94Excellent quality (A+) · 94 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 97/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M5 Ultra (512 GB)
-
92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 96/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Instinct MI350X
-
90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Instinct MI325X
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.