Ming-Image 0.1 Design on Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (32 GB)

Can the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (32 GB) run Ming-Image 0.1 Design?

Barely: it runs very slowly (encoder unloaded after use)

Very slow (encoder unloaded after use). At FP8 it needs about 20.6 GB of 26.2 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 12.7 min.

Best precision: FP8
Memory mode: Text encoder offloaded
Time per image: 12.7 min
Output: 2048×2048, 12 steps

Download Ming-Image 0.1 Design

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Ant Group (inclusionAI), for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers, Diffusers or ComfyUI.

huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ming-Image-0.1-Design (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Ant Group (inclusionAI). The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/inclusionAI/Ming-Image (opens in a new tab)

Official inference code (infer.py) for text-to-image and transparent RGBA output; the model card also recommends vLLM-Omni for serving.

git clone https://github.com/inclusionAI/Ming-Image

Links checked 5 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at FP8, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Very slowencoder unloaded after use: How well it runs on the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (32 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	37.9 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of the NAS’s memory that models can use (the rest stays with the NAS system and its storage services); fewer when it goes past that limit.	20.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	1.7 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	15.0 / 15
Match score	74.6 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every precision on the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (32 GB)

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Memory mode	Runs	Quality	Download
`FP16`	18.5 GB	26.2 GB	17.4 min	Sequential CPU offload	Very slowCPU offload	86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`FP8`	20.6 GB	26.2 GB	12.7 min	Text encoder offloaded	Very slowencoder unloaded after use	84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Other hardware that runs it

86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell FP16 · 12 s · Runs great
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (128 GB) FP16 · 31 s · Runs well
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 FP16 · 14 s · Runs well (encoder in RAM)
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB) FP16 · 36 s · Runs well
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GB10 (128 GB) FP16 · 34 s · Runs well
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 FP8 · 15 s · Runs well (tight fit · encoder in RAM)

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.