LTX-2.5 (22B, video + audio) on Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (32 GB)

Can the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (32 GB) run LTX-2.5 (22B, video + audio)?

Barely: it runs very slowly (CPU offload)

Very slow (CPU offload). At Q8 GGUF it needs about 20.3 GB of 26.2 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 1.9 h.

Best precision: Q8 GGUF
Memory mode: Sequential CPU offload
Time per clip: 1.9 h
Output: 1280×704, 121 frames, 8 steps

Download LTX-2.5 (22B, video + audio)

Recommended for the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (32 GB): q8_gguf. Every other precision has its own download link in the table below.

Quantized files · GGUF for ComfyUI

Smaller GGUF versions for ComfyUI (with the ComfyUI-GGUF node). No sign-in needed; the model’s license still applies.

Download the q8_gguf (Q8_0) file (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/unsloth/LTX-2.5-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Lightricks, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers, Diffusers or ComfyUI.

huggingface.co/Lightricks/LTX-2.5 (opens in a new tab)

Free Hugging Face account needed: accept the license on the model page and the download starts right away.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Lightricks. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/Lightricks/LTX-2 (opens in a new tab)

git clone https://github.com/Lightricks/LTX-2

Links checked 1 day ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at Q8 GGUF, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Very slowCPU offload: How well it runs on the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (32 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	39.2 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of the NAS’s memory that models can use (the rest stays with the NAS system and its storage services); fewer when it goes past that limit.	12.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	2.5 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	15.0 / 15
Match score	68.7 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every precision on the Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (32 GB)

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Memory mode	Runs	Quality	Download
`FP16`	27.1 GB	26.2 GB	—	—	Won't run	88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`FP8`	19.7 GB	26.2 GB	87.5 min	Sequential CPU offload	Very slowCPU offload	86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`Q8 GGUF`	20.3 GB	26.2 GB	1.9 h	Sequential CPU offload	Very slowCPU offload	87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q4 GGUF`	16.8 GB	26.2 GB	1.9 h	Sequential CPU offload	Very slowCPU offload	81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)

Other hardware that runs it

88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 94/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GB10 (128 GB) FP16 · 3.2 min · Runs great
88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB) FP16 · 3.3 min · Runs great
87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Q8 GGUF · 77 s · Runs great
86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (128 GB) FP8 · 2.6 min · Runs great
88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB) FP16 · 6.6 min · Runs well
81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Q4 GGUF · 1.6 min · Runs great (encoder in RAM)

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.