LongCat Flash Chat (560B) on NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip
Can the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip run LongCat Flash Chat (560B)?
Yes, it runs well (tight fit)
Runs well (tight fit). At Q2_K it needs about 238 GB of 252 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 200 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q2_K- Generation speed
- 200 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 2,133 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.5 s
- Largest safe context
- 128K
Best app to run it on the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip
On Windows
- Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
On Linux
- Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
Download LongCat Flash Chat (560B)
Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
huggingface.co/ggml-org/LongCat-Flash-Chat-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/ggml-org/LongCat-Flash-Chat-GGUFOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Meituan, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Meituan. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-Chat (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/meituan-longcat/LongCat-Flash-ChatHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 27.7 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 24.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 81.7 / 100 |
Every quantization on the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 238 GB | 252 GB | 200 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 289 GB | 252 GB | — | Won't run | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 356 GB | 252 GB | — | Won't run | 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 412 GB | 252 GB | — | Won't run | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 474 GB | 252 GB | — | Won't run | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 609 GB | 252 GB | — | Won't run | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 1,137 GB | 252 GB | — | Won't run | 88Excellent quality (A+) · 88 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB)
-
83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M5 Ultra (512 GB)
-
61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Instinct MI350X
-
61Good quality (B) · 61 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Instinct MI325X
-
83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB)
-
73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (512 GB)
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.