LLM4Decompile 22B V2 on AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (128 GB)

Can the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (128 GB) run LLM4Decompile 22B V2?

Yes, it runs well

Runs well. At Q4_K_M it needs about 23.7 GB of 96.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 12.2 tok/s.

Best quant: Q4_K_M
Generation speed: 12.2 tok/s
Prompt processing: 1,655 tok/s
First token (1K prompt): 0.6 s
Largest safe context: 32K

Best app to run it on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (128 GB)

On Windows

Lemonade

Desktop app · runs on llama.cpp, ONNX Runtime GenAI (Ryzen AI NPU)

Built for Ryzen AI and Strix Halo, including NPU + iGPU modes on Windows.

lemonade pull mradermacher/llm4decompile-22b-v2-GGUF:Q4_K_M

LM Studio Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
llama.cpp Usually the first to support new model architectures.

On Linux

Lemonade

Desktop app · runs on llama.cpp, ONNX Runtime GenAI (Ryzen AI NPU)

Built for Ryzen AI and Strix Halo, including NPU + iGPU modes on Windows.

lemonade pull mradermacher/llm4decompile-22b-v2-GGUF:Q4_K_M

LM Studio Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
llama.cpp Usually the first to support new model architectures.

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download LLM4Decompile 22B V2

Recommended for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (128 GB): Q4_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.

Quantized files · GGUF

Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.

Download the Q4_K_M file (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/mradermacher/llm4decompile-22b-v2-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

ollama run hf.co/mradermacher/llm4decompile-22b-v2-GGUF:Q4_K_M

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from LLM4Binary, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/LLM4Binary/llm4decompile-22b-v2 (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from LLM4Binary. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/albertan017/LLM4Decompile (opens in a new tab)

Official code and the Ghidra script that feeds decompiler output to the V2 models.

git clone https://github.com/albertan017/LLM4Decompile

Links checked 1 day ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at Q4_K_M, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Runs well: How well it runs on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (128 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	24.8 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of unified memory the GPU can use; fewer when it goes past that limit.	25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	8.3 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	5.7 / 15
Match score	63.8 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (128 GB)

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Runs	Quality	Download
`Q2_K`	19.1 GB	96.0 GB	20.0 tok/s	Runs well	40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q3_K_M`	21.1 GB	96.0 GB	15.7 tok/s	Runs well	48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q4_K_M`	23.7 GB	96.0 GB	12.2 tok/s	Runs well	55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 63/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q5_K_M`	26.0 GB	96.0 GB	10.0 tok/s	Runs well	56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q6_K`	28.4 GB	96.0 GB	8.4 tok/s	Slow	57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q8_0`	33.7 GB	96.0 GB	6.2 tok/s	Slow	58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`F16`	54.7 GB	96.0 GB	2.9 tok/s	Very slow	58Good quality (B) · 58 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

57Good quality (B) · 57 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Q6_K · 68.6 tok/s · Runs great
56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Q5_K_M · 42.7 tok/s · Runs great
56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Q5_K_M · 45.9 tok/s · Runs great
56Good quality (B) · 56 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Q5_K_M · 37.7 tok/s · Runs great
48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Q3_K_M · 47.9 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER Q3_K_M · 52.5 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.