on

Can the Apple M4 Max (128 GB) run Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct?

46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.

Yes, it runs well

Runs well. At Q2_K it needs about 47.1 GB of 96.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 10.7 tok/s.

Best quant
Q2_K
Generation speed
10.7 tok/s
Prompt processing
129 tok/s
First token (1K prompt)
8.0 s
Largest safe context
124K

Best app to run it on the Apple M4 Max (128 GB)

On macOS

LM Studio

Desktop app · runs on llama.cpp, MLX · use the MLX build

  • Runs the MLX build, typically up to 10% faster than GGUF for a model with 88.6B active parameters on Apple silicon.
  • Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.

Open Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct in LM Studio

  • Ollama One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.
  • Jan Runs the MLX build, typically up to 10% faster than GGUF for a model with 88.6B active parameters on Apple silicon.

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct

Quickest · Ollama

One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.

Get Ollama at ollama.com/download (opens in a new tab) · model page (opens in a new tab)

ollama run llama3.2-vision:90b

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Meta, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct (opens in a new tab)

Free Hugging Face account needed: request access on the model page, and Meta approves it (usually within minutes to a few hours).

How it’s rated

Quality 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
How capable the model itself is at Q2_K, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Runs well
How well it runs on the Apple M4 Max (128 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.20.8 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of unified memory the GPU can use; fewer when it goes past that limit.25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.7.8 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.11.3 / 15
Match score64.9 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the Apple M4 Max (128 GB)

Quant Memory needed Available Speed Runs Quality Download
Q2_K 47.1 GB 96.0 GB 10.7 tok/s Runs well 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q3_K_M 55.0 GB 96.0 GB 8.4 tok/s Slow 55Good quality (B) · 55 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q4_K_M 65.7 GB 96.0 GB 6.5 tok/s Slow 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Q5_K_M 74.5 GB 96.0 GB 5.4 tok/s Slow 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q6_K 84.3 GB 96.0 GB 4.5 tok/s Slowtight fit 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. All files (opens in a new tab)
Q8_0 106 GB 96.0 GB 2.8 tok/s Very slowover GPU memory limit 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
F16 189 GB 96.0 GB — Won't run 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 8/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?