Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 (560B-A25B) on NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip
Can the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip run Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 (560B-A25B)?
Yes, it runs well (tight fit)
Runs well (tight fit). At Q2_K it needs about 242 GB of 252 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 205 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q2_K- Generation speed
- 205 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 2,304 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.4 s
- Largest safe context
- 937K
Best app to run it on the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip
On Windows
- Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
On Linux
- Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
Download Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 (560B-A25B)
Recommended for the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip: Q2_K. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q2_K files (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/bartowski/Ling-3.1-flash-1019-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/bartowski/Ling-3.1-flash-1019-GGUFOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Ant Group (inclusionAI), for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/inclusionAI/Ling-3.1-flash-1019 (opens in a new tab)
How it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 30.6 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 24.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 84.6 / 100 |
Every quantization on the NVIDIA GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 242 GB | 252 GB | 205 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 294 GB | 252 GB | — | Won't run | 81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 362 GB | 252 GB | — | Won't run | 92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 419 GB | 252 GB | — | Won't run | 94Excellent quality (A+) · 94 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 482 GB | 252 GB | — | Won't run | 96Excellent quality (A+) · 96 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 13/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 620 GB | 252 GB | — | Won't run | 97Excellent quality (A+) · 97 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 13/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 1,158 GB | 252 GB | — | Won't run | 97Excellent quality (A+) · 97 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 13/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB)
-
92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 95/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M5 Ultra (512 GB)
-
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Instinct MI350X
-
68Good quality (B) · 68 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Instinct MI325X
-
92Excellent quality (A+) · 92 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB)
-
81Great quality (A) · 81 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (512 GB)
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.