Ling 1T on Apple M5 Ultra (512 GB)
Can the Apple M5 Ultra (512 GB) run Ling 1T?
Yes, but slowly (far over GPU memory limit)
Slow (far over GPU memory limit). At Q2_K it needs about 434 GB of 384 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 31.3 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q2_K- Generation speed
- 31.3 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 467 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 2.2 s
- Largest safe context
- —
Best app to run it on the Apple M5 Ultra (512 GB)
On macOS
- Splits the model between GPU memory and system RAM, which this setup needs.
- Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
Download Ling 1T
Recommended for the Apple M5 Ultra (512 GB): Q2_K. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q2_K files (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/unsloth/Ling-1T-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Ling-1T-GGUFOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Ant Group (inclusionAI), for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Ant Group (inclusionAI). The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/inclusionAI/Ling-V2 (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/inclusionAI/Ling-V2How it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 28.4 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 4.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 13.3 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 15.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 60.6 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Apple M5 Ultra (512 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 434 GB | 384 GB | 31.3 tok/s | Slowfar over GPU memory limit | 63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 60/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 524 GB | 384 GB | — | Won't run | 75Great quality (A) · 75 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 644 GB | 384 GB | — | Won't run | 85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 744 GB | 384 GB | — | Won't run | 87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 854 GB | 384 GB | — | Won't run | 89Excellent quality (A+) · 89 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 1,094 GB | 384 GB | — | Won't run | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 2,033 GB | 384 GB | — | Won't run | 90Excellent quality (A+) · 90 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 12/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · folder (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 58/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (512 GB)
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB)
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Intel Xeon Silver (4100 to 4300 series) NAS (512 GB)
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Intel Xeon W-2100 series NAS (512 GB)
-
63Good quality (B) · 63 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Intel Xeon D-2700 series NAS (512 GB)
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.