Hunyuan A13B (80B-A13B) on NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB)
Can the NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB) run Hunyuan A13B (80B-A13B)?
Yes, it runs well
Runs well. At Q4_K_M it needs about 58.9 GB of 102 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 25.9 tok/s.
- Best quant
Q4_K_M- Generation speed
- 25.9 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 1,595 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 0.6 s
- Largest safe context
- 32K
Best app to run it on the NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB)
On Linux
- The full model fits in GPU memory at 8-bit, so it can batch many requests: best for serving a team or an app.
vllm serve tencent/Hunyuan-A13B-InstructDownload Hunyuan A13B (80B-A13B)
Recommended for the NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB): Q4_K_M. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the Q4_K_M file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/tencent/Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/tencent/Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_MOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Tencent, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
huggingface.co/tencent/Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct (opens in a new tab)
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Tencent. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/Hunyuan-A13B (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/Hunyuan-A13BHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 31.6 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 12.1 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 13.3 / 15 | |
| Match score | 82.0 / 100 |
Every quantization on the NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X (6144-core GPU) (128 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 42.0 GB | 102 GB | 40.6 tok/s | Runs great | 51Fair quality (C) · 51 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q3_K_M | 49.3 GB | 102 GB | 32.7 tok/s | Runs great | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q4_K_M | 58.9 GB | 102 GB | 25.9 tok/s | Runs well | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 66.9 GB | 102 GB | 21.6 tok/s | Runs well | 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 75.8 GB | 102 GB | 18.4 tok/s | Runs well | 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 95.1 GB | 102 GB | 13.7 tok/s | Runs welltight fit | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF · part 1 of 2 (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 171 GB | 102 GB | — | Won't run | 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 9/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M2 Ultra (192 GB)
-
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (128 GB)
-
73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M3 Ultra (256 GB)
-
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M4 Max (64 GB)
-
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
Apple M1 Max (64 GB)
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.