gpt-oss-safeguard 20B on AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Can the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT run gpt-oss-safeguard 20B?

Barely: it runs very slowly (tight fit)

Very slow (tight fit). At MXFP4 it needs about 13.7 GB of 16.0 GB usable and makes one decision in about 3.6 s.

Best quant: MXFP4
Time per decision: 3.6 s
Decisions per second: 0.3/s
Input assumed: 512 tokens
Returns: Reasoned verdict

Best app to run it on the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

On Windows

Lemonade

Desktop app · runs on llama.cpp, ONNX Runtime GenAI (Ryzen AI NPU)

AMD’s own app: llama.cpp tuned for Radeon on Vulkan and ROCm.

lemonade pull unsloth/gpt-oss-safeguard-20b-GGUF:MXFP4

LM Studio Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
Ollama One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.

On Linux

Lemonade

Desktop app · runs on llama.cpp, ONNX Runtime GenAI (Ryzen AI NPU)

AMD’s own app: llama.cpp tuned for Radeon on Vulkan and ROCm.

lemonade pull unsloth/gpt-oss-safeguard-20b-GGUF:MXFP4

LM Studio Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.
Ollama One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download gpt-oss-safeguard 20B

Quickest · Ollama

One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.

Get Ollama at ollama.com/download (opens in a new tab) · model page (opens in a new tab)

ollama run gpt-oss-safeguard:20b

Quantized files · GGUF

Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.

huggingface.co/unsloth/gpt-oss-safeguard-20b-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

ollama run hf.co/unsloth/gpt-oss-safeguard-20b-GGUF

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from OpenAI, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/openai/gpt-oss-safeguard-20b (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Links checked 2 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at MXFP4, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: S 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Very slowtight fit: How well it runs on the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT: speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

PrecisionEditorial precision tier from the model’s published benchmarks, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	34.2 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when everything sits in GPU memory; fewer when part spills to system RAM.	24.0 / 25
SpeedTime for one decision against a 100 ms target: reading the input plus any tokens the model writes.	2.5 / 15
ClarityHow easy the answer is to use in code: a probability or score earns the most, written feedback before a score the least.	10.0 / 15
Match score	70.7 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Time per decision	Runs	Quality	Download
`MXFP4`	13.7 GB	16.0 GB	3.6 s	Very slowtight fit	76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`F16`	44.5 GB	16.0 GB	—	Won't run	76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Times are for one request with a 512-token input and about 160 tokens written. Batching servers process many requests at once.

Other hardware that runs it

76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA B200 MXFP4 · 130 ms · Runs great
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Instinct MI350X MXFP4 · 153 ms · Runs well
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 80/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Instinct MI325X MXFP4 · 192 ms · Runs well
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA H200 141GB SXM MXFP4 · 206 ms · Runs well
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA H200 NVL MXFP4 · 208 ms · Runs well
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 79/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Instinct MI300X MXFP4 · 214 ms · Runs well

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.