gpt-oss 20B on AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB)
Can the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB) run gpt-oss 20B?
Yes, it runs great
Runs great. At MXFP4 it needs about 50.4 GB of 471 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 36.4 tok/s.
- Best quant
MXFP4- Generation speed
- 36.4 tok/s
- Prompt processing
- 111 tok/s
- First token (1K prompt)
- 9.2 s
- Largest safe context
- 128K
Best app to run it on the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB)
On Linux
- One command with Ollama’s own build of this model.
- Serves an OpenAI-compatible API that other apps and coding tools can use.
ollama run gpt-oss:20bCoding agents
Personal assistants
Download gpt-oss 20B
Recommended for the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB): MXFP4. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.
Quickest · Ollama
One command downloads a ready-to-run version and starts a chat.
ollama run gpt-oss:20bQuantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
Download the MXFP4 file (opens in a new tab)
huggingface.co/ggml-org/gpt-oss-20b-GGUF (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/ggml-org/gpt-oss-20b-GGUF:MXFP4Original weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from OpenAI, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
Official repo · GitHub
Reference code, inference scripts and docs from OpenAI. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.
github.com/openai/gpt-oss (opens in a new tab)
git clone https://github.com/openai/gpt-ossHow it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Model quality | 31.5 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 14.3 / 15 | |
| Memory use | 2.5 / 15 | |
| Match score | 73.3 / 100 |
Every quantization on the AMD EPYC 7002 / 7003 series NAS (512 GB)
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Speed | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXFP4 | 50.4 GB | 471 GB | 36.4 tok/s | Runs great | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 80.3 GB | 471 GB | 8.8 tok/s | Slow | 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.
Other hardware that runs it
-
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
-
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
-
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
-
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
-
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
-
70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at MXFP4, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.