Can the Intel Arc A380 run GLIDER?
Barely: it runs very slowly
Very slow. At Q6_K it needs about 4.8 GB of 6.0 GB usable and makes one decision in about 5.6 s.
- Best quant
Q6_K- Time per decision
- 5.6 s
- Decisions per second
- 0.2/s
- Input assumed
- 1,024 tokens
- Returns
- Written feedback, then a score
Best app to run it on the Intel Arc A380
On Windows
- Supports Intel Arc through SYCL and Vulkan.
- Usually the first to support new model architectures.
llama-server -hf PatronusAI/glider-gguf:Q6_KDownload GLIDER
Quantized files · GGUF
Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.
huggingface.co/PatronusAI/glider-gguf (opens in a new tab)
ollama run hf.co/PatronusAI/glider-ggufOriginal weights · Hugging Face
Full-precision files from Patronus AI, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.
How it’s rated
Match score
To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.
| Precision | 29.4 / 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory fit | 25.0 / 25 | |
| Speed | 2.0 / 15 | |
| Clarity | 9.0 / 15 | |
| Match score | 65.4 / 100 |
Every quantization on the Intel Arc A380
| Quant | Memory needed | Available | Time per decision | Runs | Quality | Download |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q4_K_M | 4.0 GB | 6.0 GB | 4.2 s | Very slow | 62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q5_K_M | 4.4 GB | 6.0 GB | 4.8 s | Very slow | 64Good quality (B) · 64 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
Q6_K | 4.8 GB | 6.0 GB | 5.6 s | Very slow | 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF files (opens in a new tab) |
Q8_0 | 5.8 GB | 6.0 GB | 7.3 s | Very slowtight fit | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 64/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) |
F16 | 9.3 GB | 6.0 GB | 22.2 s | Very slowheavy RAM offload | 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 43/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. | GGUF (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab) |
Times are for one request with a 1,024-token input and about 150 tokens written. Batching servers process many requests at once.
Other hardware that runs it
-
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
-
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
-
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 77/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA B200
-
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Instinct MI350X
-
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
AMD Instinct MI325X
-
62Good quality (B) · 62 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 74/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
NVIDIA H200 141GB SXM
Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.