FireRed-Image-Edit 1.1 on Intel Xeon W-2100 series NAS (32 GB)

Can the Intel Xeon W-2100 series NAS (32 GB) run FireRed-Image-Edit 1.1?

Barely: it runs very slowly (tight fit)

Very slow (tight fit). At Q4 GGUF it needs about 24.3 GB of 26.2 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 1.6 h.

Best precision: Q4 GGUF
Memory mode: Everything on GPU
Time per image: 1.6 h
Output: 1024×1024, 40 steps

Download FireRed-Image-Edit 1.1

Recommended for the Intel Xeon W-2100 series NAS (32 GB): q4_gguf. Every other precision has its own download link in the table below.

Quantized files · GGUF for ComfyUI

Smaller GGUF versions for ComfyUI (with the ComfyUI-GGUF node). No sign-in needed; the model’s license still applies.

Download the q4_gguf (Q4_1) file (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/FireRedTeam/FireRed-Image-Edit-1.1-ComfyUI (opens in a new tab)

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from rednote (FireRed Team), for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers, Diffusers or ComfyUI.

huggingface.co/FireRedTeam/FireRed-Image-Edit-1.1 (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from rednote (FireRed Team). The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/FireRedTeam/FireRed-Image-Edit (opens in a new tab)

git clone https://github.com/FireRedTeam/FireRed-Image-Edit

Links checked 1 day ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at Q4 GGUF, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Very slowtight fit: How well it runs on the Intel Xeon W-2100 series NAS (32 GB): speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	36.4 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when the model fits in the share of the NAS’s memory that models can use (the rest stays with the NAS system and its storage services); fewer when it goes past that limit.	23.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	0.6 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	15.0 / 15
Match score	75.0 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every precision on the Intel Xeon W-2100 series NAS (32 GB)

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Memory mode	Runs	Quality	Download
`FP16`	17.8 GB	26.2 GB	1.7 h	Sequential CPU offload	Very slowCPU offload	87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`FP8`	24.2 GB	26.2 GB	73.5 min	Text encoder offloaded	Very slowtight fit · encoder unloaded after use	85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 72/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`Q8 GGUF`	11.2 GB	26.2 GB	1.9 h	Sequential CPU offload	Very slowCPU offload	86Excellent quality (A+) · 86 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 61/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q4 GGUF`	24.3 GB	26.2 GB	1.6 h	Everything on GPU	Very slowtight fit	80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)

Other hardware that runs it

87Excellent quality (A+) · 87 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell FP16 · 59 s · Slow
80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Q4 GGUF · 80 s · Slow
80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 76/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Q4 GGUF · 1.7 min · Slow (encoder in RAM)
80Great quality (A) · 80 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 75/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Q4 GGUF · 1.9 min · Slow (encoder in RAM)
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT FP8 · 2.1 min · Slow (CPU offload)
85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 FP8 · 2.1 min · Slow (CPU offload)

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.