Can the Intel Arc A380 run ERNIE-Image Turbo?

Yes, it runs well (tight fit · CPU offload)

Runs well (tight fit · CPU offload). At FP8 it needs about 5.2 GB of 6.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 38 s.

Best precision: FP8
Memory mode: Sequential CPU offload
Time per image: 38 s
Output: 1024×1024, 8 steps

Best app to run it on the Intel Arc A380

On Windows

ComfyUI

Desktop app · runs on PyTorch (ComfyUI), GGUF via ComfyUI-GGUF

Runs this model with built-in or popular custom nodes; GGUF files load with ComfyUI-GGUF.

Get ComfyUI

On Linux

ComfyUI

Desktop app · runs on PyTorch (ComfyUI), GGUF via ComfyUI-GGUF

Runs this model with built-in or popular custom nodes; GGUF files load with ComfyUI-GGUF.

Get ComfyUI

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download ERNIE-Image Turbo

Quantized files · GGUF for ComfyUI

Smaller GGUF versions for ComfyUI (with the ComfyUI-GGUF node). No sign-in needed; the model’s license still applies.

huggingface.co/unsloth/ERNIE-Image-Turbo-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Baidu, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers, Diffusers or ComfyUI.

huggingface.co/baidu/ERNIE-Image-Turbo (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Baidu. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/baidu/ERNIE-Image (opens in a new tab)

git clone https://github.com/baidu/ERNIE-Image

Links checked 1 day ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at FP8, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Runs welltight fit · CPU offload: How well it runs on the Intel Arc A380: speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	37.5 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when everything sits in GPU memory; fewer when part spills to system RAM.	10.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	7.7 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	15.0 / 15
Match score	70.2 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every precision on the Intel Arc A380

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Memory mode	Runs	Quality	Download
`FP16`	8.1 GB	6.0 GB	—	—	Won't run	85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 11/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`FP8`	5.2 GB	6.0 GB	38 s	Sequential CPU offload	Runs welltight fit · CPU offload	83Great quality (A) · 83 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 70/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`Q8 GGUF`	5.4 GB	6.0 GB	49 s	Sequential CPU offload	Slowtight fit · CPU offload	84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)
`Q4 GGUF`	4.1 GB	6.0 GB	51 s	Sequential CPU offload	SlowCPU offload	79Great quality (A) · 79 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 69/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	GGUF (opens in a new tab)

Other hardware that runs it

85Excellent quality (A+) · 85 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 FP16 · 2.7 s · Runs great
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Q8 GGUF · 4.1 s · Runs great
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Q8 GGUF · 6.9 s · Runs great
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Q8 GGUF · 3.7 s · Runs great
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT Q8 GGUF · 4.9 s · Runs well (tight fit)
84Great quality (A) · 84 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8 GGUF, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Q8 GGUF · 9.9 s · Runs well (tight fit)

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.