Can the Intel Arc A380 run Chroma1-HD?

Barely: it runs very slowly (tight fit · CPU offload)

Very slow (tight fit · CPU offload). At FP8 it needs about 5.7 GB of 6.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 4.0 min.

Best precision: FP8
Memory mode: Sequential CPU offload
Time per image: 4.0 min
Output: 1024×1024, 40 steps

Best app to run it on the Intel Arc A380

On Windows

ComfyUI

Desktop app · runs on PyTorch (ComfyUI), GGUF via ComfyUI-GGUF

Runs this model with built-in or popular custom nodes; GGUF files load with ComfyUI-GGUF.

Get ComfyUI

On Linux

ComfyUI

Desktop app · runs on PyTorch (ComfyUI), GGUF via ComfyUI-GGUF

Runs this model with built-in or popular custom nodes; GGUF files load with ComfyUI-GGUF.

Get ComfyUI

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download Chroma1-HD

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Lodestone Rock, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers, Diffusers or ComfyUI.

huggingface.co/lodestones/Chroma1-HD (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Lodestone Rock. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/lodestone-rock/flow (opens in a new tab)

git clone https://github.com/lodestone-rock/flow

Links checked 6 days ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.: How capable the model itself is at FP8, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Very slowtight fit · CPU offload: How well it runs on the Intel Arc A380: speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.	34.4 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when everything sits in GPU memory; fewer when part spills to system RAM.	10.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.	3.1 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.	15.0 / 15
Match score	62.5 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every precision on the Intel Arc A380

Quant	Memory needed	Available	Speed	Memory mode	Runs	Quality	Download
`FP16`	8.8 GB	6.0 GB	—	—	Won't run	78Great quality (A) · 78 of 100: how capable the model is at FP16, whatever it runs on. Match score 10/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`FP8`	5.7 GB	6.0 GB	4.0 min	Sequential CPU offload	Very slowtight fit · CPU offload	76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)
`NF4`	4.3 GB	6.0 GB	4.9 min	Sequential CPU offload	Very slowCPU offload	72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.	Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Other hardware that runs it

76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 FP8 · 18 s · Runs well
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 84/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX FP8 · 20 s · Runs well
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 83/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 FP8 · 15 s · Runs well
76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at FP8, whatever it runs on. Match score 82/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 FP8 · 34 s · Runs well
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT NF4 · 29 s · Runs well
72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at NF4, whatever it runs on. Match score 81/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 NF4 · 29 s · Runs well

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.