on

Can the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 run Chandra OCR 2?

48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.

Yes, it runs great

Runs great. At F16 it needs about 12.7 GB of 24.0 GB usable, with an estimated speed of 54.8 tok/s.

Best quant
F16
Generation speed
54.8 tok/s
Prompt processing
11,221 tok/s
First token (1K prompt)
0.3 s
Largest safe context
256K

Best app to run it on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

On Windows

LM Studio

Desktop app · runs on llama.cpp, MLX

  • Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.

Open Chandra OCR 2 in LM Studio

  • llama.cpp Usually the first to support new model architectures.
  • Ollama Runs the Hugging Face GGUF with ollama run hf.co/…

On Linux

LM Studio

Desktop app · runs on llama.cpp, MLX

  • Point-and-click: search, download and chat in one window.

Open Chandra OCR 2 in LM Studio

  • llama.cpp Usually the first to support new model architectures.
  • Ollama Runs the Hugging Face GGUF with ollama run hf.co/…

How we choose: the files published for this model, your operating system and GPU, whether it fits fully in memory, and published speed tests (MLX vs llama.cpp on Apple silicon, vLLM vs llama.cpp vs Ollama on NVIDIA). Details.

Download Chandra OCR 2

Recommended for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090: F16. Every other quantization has its own download link in the table below.

Quantized files · GGUF

Works in LM Studio, llama.cpp, Jan and Ollama. No sign-in needed.

Download the F16 file (opens in a new tab)

huggingface.co/mradermacher/chandra-ocr-2-GGUF (opens in a new tab)

ollama run hf.co/mradermacher/chandra-ocr-2-GGUF:F16

Original weights · Hugging Face

Full-precision files from Datalab, for fine-tuning, vLLM, Transformers.

huggingface.co/datalab-to/chandra-ocr-2 (opens in a new tab)

No sign-in needed.

Official repo · GitHub

Reference code, inference scripts and docs from Datalab. The weights themselves download from Hugging Face.

github.com/datalab-to/chandra (opens in a new tab)

git clone https://github.com/datalab-to/chandra

Links checked 1 day ago against Hugging Face, Ollama and GitHub.

How it’s rated

Quality 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking.
How capable the model itself is at F16, from its editorial quality tier scaled by the quantization or precision. It’s the same on any hardware that runs this variant. Scale: A+ 85+ · A 70+ · B 55+ · C 40+ · D under 40.
Runs Runs great
How well it runs on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090: speed, capped by how well it fits in memory. Runs great: 30+ tokens/s (or near the image, video or decision speed target) · Runs well: 10+ tokens/s · Slow: 3+ tokens/s · Very slow: under 3 · Won’t run: doesn’t fit even with offload. A tight fit or RAM offload caps it at Runs well; heavy offload caps it at Slow.

Match score

To order lists, each result also gets a match score out of 100 from four parts. It favors the most capable model that still runs well.

Model qualityEditorial quality tier of the model, scaled by the quantization or precision used.21.6 / 45
Memory fitFull marks when everything sits in GPU memory; fewer when part spills to system RAM.25.0 / 25
SpeedGeneration speed against a 40 tokens/s target for LLMs, or render time against a target for image and video.15.0 / 15
Memory useRewards using the memory you have, so a bigger, better variant beats a tiny one that leaves most memory idle.12.2 / 15
Match score73.8 / 100

The match score orders results; it is not shown as a grade. Quality and Runs are the two ratings in the tables.

Every quantization on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Quant Memory needed Available Speed Runs Quality Download
Q2_K 4.2 GB 24.0 GB 383 tok/s Runs great 33Basic quality (D) · 33 of 100: how capable the model is at Q2_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 59/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q3_K_M 4.7 GB 24.0 GB 302 tok/s Runs great 40Fair quality (C) · 40 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 62/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q4_K_M 5.3 GB 24.0 GB 233 tok/s Runs great 45Fair quality (C) · 45 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 65/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q5_K_M 5.8 GB 24.0 GB 193 tok/s Runs great 46Fair quality (C) · 46 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 66/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q6_K 6.4 GB 24.0 GB 162 tok/s Runs great 47Fair quality (C) · 47 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 67/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
Q8_0 7.7 GB 24.0 GB 119 tok/s Runs great 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 68/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab)
F16 12.7 GB 24.0 GB 54.8 tok/s Runs great 48Fair quality (C) · 48 of 100: how capable the model is at F16, whatever it runs on. Match score 73/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. GGUF (opens in a new tab) Original weights (opens in a new tab)

Memory figures assume 8K of context. Longer conversations or documents grow the KV cache.

Other hardware that runs it

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?