Best local LLMs for the Intel Arc A580

Each list assumes the context that task needs, so a model that fits for chat may rank lower for long documents.

General chat at 8K context

  1. 76Great quality (A) · 76 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 93/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. K2 Horizon 7B Q4_K_M · 53.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  2. 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. SenseNova Loop 9B Preview Q4_K_M · 49.7 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  3. 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.5 9B Q4_K_M · 49.8 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  4. 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. TMax 9B Q4_K_M · 53.6 tok/s · Runs great
  5. 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 9B Q4_K_M · 49.8 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)

Coding at 32K context

  1. 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B Q4_K_M · 51.0 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  2. 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 4B Q6_K · 83.7 tok/s · Runs great
  3. 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Spark-X2.6 4B Q8_0 · 59.5 tok/s · Runs great
  4. 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. SenseNova Loop 9B Preview Q3_K_M · 64.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  5. 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.5 9B Q4_K_M · 49.8 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)

Reasoning at 32K context

  1. 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 92/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B Q4_K_M · 51.0 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  2. 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 9B Q4_K_M · 49.8 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  3. 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 4B Q6_K · 83.7 tok/s · Runs great
  4. 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Spark-X2.6 4B Q8_0 · 59.5 tok/s · Runs great
  5. 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. SenseNova Loop 9B Preview Q3_K_M · 64.3 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)

Documents (RAG) at 32K context

  1. 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.5 9B Q4_K_M · 49.8 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  2. 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 9B Q4_K_M · 49.8 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  3. 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 91/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.0 9B Q4_K_M · 49.8 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  4. 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 90/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. TMax 9B Q4_K_M · 53.6 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  5. 66Good quality (B) · 66 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B Q4_K_M · 107 tok/s · Runs great

Agents & tools at 64K context

  1. 67Good quality (B) · 67 of 100: how capable the model is at Q5_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B Q5_K_M · 88.1 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  2. 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 89/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Spark-X2.6 4B Q6_K · 81.0 tok/s · Runs great
  3. 65Good quality (B) · 65 of 100: how capable the model is at Q3_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 88/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B Q3_K_M · 66.0 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  4. 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q6_K, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. TMax 4B Q6_K · 79.1 tok/s · Runs great
  5. 60Good quality (B) · 60 of 100: how capable the model is at Q8_0, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiniCPM5 2B Q8_0 · 97.0 tok/s · Runs great

Reverse engineering at 32K context

  1. 74Great quality (A) · 74 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 87/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B Q4_K_M · 51.0 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  2. 73Great quality (A) · 73 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.5 9B Q4_K_M · 49.8 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  3. 72Great quality (A) · 72 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Qwen3.5 9B Q4_K_M · 49.8 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  4. 71Great quality (A) · 71 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 86/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. Ornith 1.0 9B Q4_K_M · 49.8 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)
  5. 70Great quality (A) · 70 of 100: how capable the model is at Q4_K_M, whatever it runs on. Match score 85/100 (quality, fit, speed and memory use) sets the ranking. TMax 9B Q4_K_M · 53.6 tok/s · Runs well (tight fit)

Estimates come from published hardware specs and our open formulas, not from running the model on your machine. Real speed varies with runtime, drivers and settings. Numbers marked “Measured” come from a linked benchmark.

Was this page helpful?